PC 051000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Sullivan noted he cannot make the findings to support Commissioner Maas' motion. Commissioner Sullivan made a substitute motion to deny the Tentative Map due to not being able to make the findings. Commissioner Arkin seconded the substitute motion. Commissioner Arkin noted that Commissioner Sullivan has raised some interesting ideas about whether the project meets the goals of the General Plan. A motion was made by Commissioner Sullivan, seconded by Commissioner Arkin, to deny Tentative Tract Map 7176, Mardefl, LLC. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Arkin and Sullivan Commi.sioners Malmrose and Maas, and Chairperson Roberts Commi*sioner Kameny None The motion failed. Chairperson Roberts seconded Commissioner Mans' motion. Commissioner Maas noted that items in the General Plan need to be discussed as specific issues pertaining to a development and applied to the City as a whole. Further, she advised the Commission that the developer had incorporated the Commissioners' request into the project, including Commissioner Sullivan's concerns. She noted this project will be an aesthetically pleasing project. Chairperson Roberts noted that the developers have met the requirements for the tentative map. She commented favorably on the home design and commended the developer on the plans. She noted that Commissioner Sullivan has some good points; however, all of the requirements in the General Plan cannot be met ail the time. Commissioner Sullivan noted that additional million dollar homes are not needed on th~ westside of Foothill Road. Further, he stated there should be no more homing on the westside o[Foothill Road. Commissioner Sullivan stated that the General Plan requirements were not adeqgately discussed at the PUD stage by either the Commission or the City Council. A motion was made by Commissioner Maas, seconded by Chairperson Roberts, the tentative map findings as listed in the staff report and adopt a resolution app~ vesting tentative map application subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit "B.' F that Condition 16 include an emphasis on "where feasible for the contouring;" tbs be additional care on Lot 10 nnd the visual aesthetics of the elevation facing the p~ road; that a recommendation be provided to the City to consider completing the 1~ Road median strip to Muh'wood South; and, that there be relocation of the northe to the Lemoine property. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES o make ,ving the arther, t there blic sothill rn gate May 10, 2000 Page 6