PC 030800 - Laserfiche WebLink

9. COMMUNICATIONS There were none. 10. ~ERRALS There were none. 11. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S liN-FORMATION Thcre werenone. O~ Commitqi91~ consensus, the Commission readdressed Item No. 6.b. PU1~99-03. William Kolb. Donna Miller. and Gene and Carol Strom - Application for PUD pre-zoning and PUD development plan approval for a residential subdivision consisting of 12 new single-family lots and two existing single-family homes, open space, and public park uses, and public street and infrastructure improvements located on approximately 55.4 acres; and designating an approximately 5.22-acre area for a future senior care facility. The overall project site is unincorporated and is located at 11393 Dublin Canyon Road. The Planning Commission will also consider the negative declaration prepared for the project. P~ter McDonald, representing the applicants, noted that the applicants have lived on this property for a considerable length of time and the property owners have always been good stewards of their land. He stated th. at a site sensitive plan has been developed and that the applicants have worked cooperatively with the design team, neighbors, and City staff, and that the applicants have attempted to address the concerns raised by the Commission at the December 1999 hearing. He noted that during the processing of the project, there has been major revisions of the West Foothill Road design guidelines and that as the staffreport demonstrates, minor modifications were required to bring the plan into compliance with the revised guidelines. He stated that the Kolbs had the "right spirit" of the West Foothill Road guidelines from the beginning of the project. He noted that the applicant is in agreement with the majority of the conditions listed in the staff report. He stated that originally there was no requirement from staff for the applicant to design one-story units and that was at the suggestion of the applicant. He noted the applicant expresses concurrence with staff that the height of homes be 22-feet. Mr. McDonald stated that the applicant has a concern with condition No. 27, first sentence, "With recordation of the final subdivision map, the owner of Parcel "F" shall grant an ingress/agreas easement to the owner of Parcel "O" and to the City of Pleasamon for emergency access purposes." He noted this is a small road and to make it an EVA road would require major cuts and it is not necessary. He commented on the access at the present time. He requested this first sentence in Condition No. 27 be deleted. Mr. McDonald expressed concern with Condition No. 36 and stated this has been a tree sensitive development from the beginning. However, he noted that Tree No. 110 is a tree that blew down 20 years ago and is in poor condition. He noted that the applicant agrees with Condition No. 36; PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 8, 2000 Page 5