PC 020900 - Laserfiche WebLink

r Steve Goins, Assistant Planner, referenced a staff report dated February 9, 2000, and highlighted key areas contained in the report including background information, project description, site plan, architecture, landscaping and screening, signage, and grading. In conclusion, he noted that staff's recommendation is that the Commission approve Case PUD-8l-30-8l D, subject to the conditions shown in Exhibit "B." Mr. Goins provided a color and materials board of the proposed exterior materials for the Commissioners' review. Discussion ensued relating to Condition No. 29 and the gray water system used for irrigation in Hacienda Park. PUBLIC BEARING WAS OPENED. Richard Campbell, Architect, introduced the members of the architectura1 team. Julie Mason, provided an overview of the architecture of the building, the materials used on project, the landscaping, and Title 24 requirements for an energy-efficient building. Greg Randall, landscape architect, provided an overview of the landscaping plan. He commented on the gray water system and stated that the system has been designed to convert to a gray water system; however, it does not affect the physical design of the system. Chairperson Roberts determined there were no public speakers who wished to address the Commission. r PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Commissioner Kameny noted it is a well-designed building for this site and that the exterior is aesthetically pleasing. He stated the project has met and exceeded the guidelines of Hacienda Park relating to height of buildings, setbacks, and the parking ratio. He stated he had no issues with the two-foot overhangs on the building. In conclusion, he stated he would be in support of the proposal as presented. Chairperson Roberts noted that the overhangs on the building were aesthetically pleasing. Commissioner Arkin inquired whether a shower facility is part of the plan and commented on the need for a shower facility in the project for people to utilize when bicycling or walking to work. He noted his support for the architecture of the building and stated he would vote in support of the project. Commissioner Maas initiated discussion relating to areas designated for smokers other than at entrances to buildings. Ms. Seto noted that the ordinance requires smokers to be a reasonable distance from the building; however, after that requirement is met, it is left to the property owner's discretion to determine locations of smoking areas. r PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 9, 2000 Page 3