PC 020900 - Laserfiche WebLink

ROLL CALL VOTE: r AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Arkin, Karneny, Maas, and Chairperson Roberts Commissioner Sullivan None None Resolution No. PC-2000-l2 was entered and adopted as motioned. (Recess taken from 9:10 p.m. to 9:15 p.m.) e. P AP..o:z.. Paul and Dan Dosc:ber Appeal of the Zoning Administrator's determination of the allowable location for solid fencing adjacent to the northern side lot line of the property located at 6213 Detjen Court. Zoning for the property is PUD-LDR/OS (planned Unit Development - Low Density Residential/Open Space) District. r Mr. PlllCker referenced a staffreport dated February 9, 2000, and highlighted key areas contained in the report including background information and site and project description. In conclusion, he noted that staff s recommendation is that the Commission deny the appeal, thereby upholding the Zoning Administrator's determination that the last 19 feet of solid fencing adjacent to the Doscher's northern side property line must be removed and, if fencing is desired, replaced with open view fencing installed in conformance with the fencing guidelines stated in the "Fire Protection and Landscape Guidelines for The Preserve." Discussion ensued relating to the appeal process, the dimensions of the lots, the nwnber of sections for fencing, and whether the Homeowners' Association has any liability for decisions. PUBLIC BEARING WAS OPENED. Paul Doscher, 6213 Detjen Court, provided the Commission with photographs of the fencing. He noted he has tried to accommodate maintaining views and that due to the fencing utilized by neighbors, wooden fencing and open fencing were agreed upon. He stated that he received a letter from the City stating that a complaint had been filed. He informed the Commission that the fencing was approved by the Homeowners' Association Architectura1 Committee and that fencing costs are four times what was originally estimated. He requested that the costs be taken into consideration. He noted that the Homeowners' Association Architectura1 Committee approved the fence to run to the end of the property line and pointed out that the fence is on his side of the property line. He stated that he relied on the Homeowner's Association Architectural Committee, landscape architects, and attorney to interpret the guidelines, and compromises were still made on his part. He requested that the Commission uphold the appeal. Discussion ensued relating to the guidelines for fencing, the letter received from the City, and interpretation of the term "graded building pad." r PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 9, 2000 Page 12