PC 012600 - Laserfiche WebLink

Discussion ensued relating to whether a fme can be imposed if construction regulations were not r' met. Commissioner Maas noted she will delete reference to adherence wording; however, she would add that the Commission urged the applicant to complete this project in a timely manner. There was no second to the motion. A motion was made by Chairperson Roberts, seconded by Commissioner Sullivan, that the Commission approve Case P AP-03 and uphold the appeal. . ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Arkin, Sullivan, and Chairperson Roberts Commissioners Kameny and Maas None None The motion passed on a three-to-two vote. Resolution No. PC-2000-07 was entered and adopted as motioned. Chairperson Roberts noted that the applicant has 15 days to appeal the decision of the Commission to the City Council. f" a. 1999 Growth Manal!:ement Rt!~rt and Reauests for Reallocations from Greenbriar Hemes (Bridle Creek). Trident Assoeiates (Castlewood Estates). and Blaek Meuntllin Develooment (Carnal!e Gardens) Mr. Swift referenced a memorandum dated January 20, 2000 and provided a brief overview of the process for the Commission. PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Michael Harlan, Greenbriar Development, 790 I Stoneridge Drive, requested that Greenbriar's reallocation be approved. He noted that Greenbriar has 49 units from 1998 that Greenbriar was unable to utilize. He noted that the project is proceeding very well and the 49 units will be utilized next year. Further, he noted that in the first-come, frrst-served category projects have been omitted and therefore the report may be incomplete. He noted that there was no growth allocation for Lund Ranch, which has a mid-point density of 86 units and which was designated as a funding developer sharing in the infrastructure costs for the North Sycamore Specific Plan. He requested that Lund Ranch units be added in. r Darrell Bolognes, Braddock and Logan, 4155 Blackhawk Plaza Circle, noted that this developer has recently purchased the Castlewood Estates project and that the project is moving forward. He noted the project was originally given allocations in 1997-1998. He commented on the progress of the project and requested that 29 allocations be approved for this project. He noted that these allocations are part of the 82 allocations approved in 1998. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 26, 2000 Page 14