My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 2000-45
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
PC 2000-45
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:32:47 AM
Creation date
8/15/2001 6:14:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/9/2000
DOCUMENT NO
PC 2000-45
DOCUMENT NAME
CEQA Findings
NOTES
Bernal Property
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Me~ure QI. None. <br /> <br />FAlllli~: Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation <br />me~ures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. <br /> <br />Facts_ in S _ ~u~x~ of Findin_u: The following facts demonstrate that it is not feasible to <br />mit~gate the impact to a less than significant level. <br /> <br /> a. The Greenbriar PUD Plan must conform to the policies and programs of the <br />Plea~anton General Plan, inclusive of those which address seismic concerns. In <br />addition, all construction in the study area must conform to the Uniform Building <br />Code and other applicable state and local seismic safety regulations. These <br />requirements mitigate potential risk to development from seismic events to the <br />maximum extent feasible based on current knowledge and technology. The level of <br />safely meets the City's acceptable risk policy. All project plans will be closely <br />reviewed by the City for compliance with these standards. <br /> <br /> b. The likelihood for seismic and geologic hazards will be evaluated during the <br />development review process, and state-of-the-art soil engineering/construction <br />standards designed to reduce seismic risk are to be implemented. <br /> <br /> c. The PUD Plan requires preparation of detailed geotechnical investigations <br />prior to approval of new development. Applicable recommendations from these <br />investigations must be incorporated into the development, and local building codes <br />must be followed in the process of siting, designing, and consl~ucting habitable <br />structures. <br /> <br /> d. The standardized requirements in the local building code ensure that sound <br />engineering practices will be followed so that all soils following grading will support <br />the Project improvements to' the maximum extent feasible. <br /> <br /> e. Pleasanton adopted a finding of overriding considerations for seismic safety <br />in 1996 as it adopted its General Plan. <br /> <br /> f. The development proposed under all the alternatives would be exposed to <br />impacts from seismic events. The No Project Alternative is rejected because it would <br />not meet any of the Project Sponsor's objectives nor would it fulfill any of the City's <br />objectives for this site, including provisiol~ of additional housing, open space, <br />affordable housing, an elementary school site and public improvements. <br /> <br />65 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.