Laserfiche WebLink
5. ~, Some proposed residential development on the Central Parcel south <br />of the Village Center would be exposed to a Ldn of greater than 65 dB. <br /> <br />Mitieation Measures: <br /> <br />Measure Lie(2). Increase the height and extend the length of the proposed landscaped <br />berm. <br /> <br />Memure L 1 c(3). Require detailed project-specific noise studies for each development <br />project in an area where the standard is exceeded to characterize noise conditions and <br />to identify the noise reduction features that must be incorporated to achieve acceptable <br />interior noise levels, and require incorporation of those features into construction. <br /> <br />~: Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation <br />measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. <br /> <br />Facts in S _u~o_ rt of Findirm: The following facts demonstrate that it is not feasible to <br />mitigate the impact to a less than significant level. <br /> <br /> a. The Facts in Support of Finding for Impact Lla(1) are incorporated by <br />reference. <br /> <br />6. ~ .Proposed single-family residential development on the Central Parcel <br />between Bernal Avenue and the south end of the Village Center would be exposed to a <br />Ldn of greater than 60 dB. <br /> <br />Mitigation Measures: <br /> <br />Measure Lld(l) and (2). Increase the height and extend the length of the noise <br />mitigation feature proposed for that portion of the Central Parcel south of the Village <br /> <br />MeaSure Lid(3). Require detailed project-specific noise studies for each development <br />project in an area where the standard is exceeded to characterize noise conditions and <br />to identify the noise reduction features that must be incorporated to achieve acceptable <br />interior noise levels, and require incorporation of those features into construction. <br /> <br />Findinm Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation <br />meaSUres or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. <br /> <br />Fae~ hl Su_n_nort of Finding: The following facts demonstrate that it is not feasible to <br />mitigate the impact to a less than significant level. <br /> <br /> a. The Facts in Support of Finding for Impact Lla(1) are incoi~orated by <br />reference. <br /> <br />59 <br /> <br /> <br />