My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 2000-45
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
PC 2000-45
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:32:47 AM
Creation date
8/15/2001 6:14:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/9/2000
DOCUMENT NO
PC 2000-45
DOCUMENT NAME
CEQA Findings
NOTES
Bernal Property
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~I. UNAVOIDABLE, ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS <br /> <br />These findings identify those project impacts that, even with mitigation, cannot be <br />redv~ced to a less than significant level. These significant, unavoidable impacts are <br />acceptable when balanced against the considerations set forth below and in the <br />Stat~nmnt ofOverriding Consideratinns. The infeasibility ofaltematives (Cooperative <br />Plan, the Preferred Plan, the No Golf Course Plan and the County adopted Specific <br />Plan) analyzed in the EIR is discussed below. <br /> <br />A. Land Use <br /> <br />1. I~.~.: Conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural uses. <br /> <br />Miti~alion Measure: None. <br /> <br />~: Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation <br />measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. <br /> <br />Facts in Su~_ not~ of Finding: The following facts demonstrate that it is not feasible to <br />mitigate the impact to a less than significant level. <br /> <br /> a. By definition, if a soil meets the Soil Conversation Service's criteria for <br />designation as prime farmland, removal or disruption of that land constitutes a <br />significant, adverse impact. Because approximately 500 out orS10 acres on the <br />Bemal Property site are designated as prime agricultural farmland, implementation of <br />the Greenbriar Project, both at the project and cumulative level, cannot avoid this <br />outcome. <br /> <br /> b. Converting the land's use from that of agriculture to one of an urban nature <br />has been anticipated in the City's planning process since 1965, when the General Plan <br />proposed the site be developed with industrial uses. In 1986, the newly revised <br />General Plan designated the Bernal Property as "Specific Plan", allowing for <br />development of the site in mixed use. It is not possible to develop the property with a <br />mixed use development and preserve any agricultural use of the site given the <br />incompatibility of agricultural uses with urban residential, commercial and currently <br />unplanned future public uses. Pleasanton adopted a finding of overriding <br />consideration for converting this area to urbanized uses in 1996 as it adopted its <br />General Plan. <br /> <br /> c. The Alameda County EIIL prepared in 1995 for the Bernal Property Specific <br />Plan proposed in that time, includes a detailed analysis of the project's consistency <br />with the East County Area Plan (ECAP). While the ECAP typically considers the <br />conversion of prime agricultural lands a significant, adverse impact, it also recognizes <br />the geographical isolation of the Bernal Property from other agricultural uses. The <br />ECAP acknowledges that, "in spite of this area's prime soil designation, its value for <br /> <br />51 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.