My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 01063
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
RES 01063
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2001 11:41:59 PM
Creation date
7/20/2001 8:45:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/5/2001
DOCUMENT NO
RES 01063
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'/ <br /> <br />6A <br /> <br />pL£AS&NTONo <br /> <br />City Council <br />Staff RePort <br /> <br /> June 5, 2001 <br />Planning Department <br /> <br />APPLICANT: Chamberlin Associates <br /> <br />Reconsideration of the Appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of Case <br />PUDD-81-30-84D, an application to cons~xuct a 44,250-square-foot, two- <br />story Office building on the Pedro's restaurant site. <br /> <br />GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Business Park <br /> <br />ZONING: <br /> <br />PUD-I/C-O (Planned Unit Development - Industrial, Commercial, and <br />Offices) District <br /> <br />LOCATION: 2.7-acre site at 5075 Hopyard Road (Site IA, Hacienda Business Park) <br /> <br />PLANNinG COMMISSION ACTION: Denied the project and initiated a process to re- <br /> evaluate the land use designation on the site. <br /> <br />HOUSING COMMISSION ACTION: <br /> <br />Took no action on t~e. site itself, but took action <br />to inform the City Council of its interest in <br />exploring the development of General Plan <br />policies as part of the Housing Element update <br />which could facilitate affordable housing with <br />commercial development. <br /> <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: <br /> <br />Find the use acceptable and refer the building's <br />design to the Planning Commission for review. <br /> <br />SUMMARY: <br /> <br />Th~ Co~acil chose to reconsider its determination to retain the existing land use and refer the <br />buildiag's ~chitecture ~tothe planning Commission, with input from the City's peer reviewer <br />architect, especially with respect to possible housing uses on the site. Staff and the Housing <br /> <br />SR:01:132 <br />Pa~e 1 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.