RES 74024 - Laserfiche WebLink

Sec. te mitigate anticipated impacts er ebJectiens). In particular the maJer issues raised when the ~i~ecter's positien is at variance with recemmendatiens an~ ebJec-~ tions raised in the comments must be addressed in detail giving reasens why specific cemments an~ sug- gestions were net accepted, and facters ef everri~lng impertance warranting an override of the suggestiens. Eegree of Specificity. The degree ef specificity required in an EIR will correspond te the degree ef specificity in- velved in the underly.ing activity which is described in the EIR. (a) An EIR en a censtructien prsJect will necessarily be more detailed in the specific effects ef the project than will be an EIR on the adoptien efa lecal general plan or cemprehensive zening erdinance because the effects of the censtructien Can be predicted with greater accuracy. (b) An EIR en preJects such as the adoptien er amendment efa cemprehensive zening erdinance era lecal. general plan sheul~ fecus en the secen~ary effects that can be expected te fellew frem the adeptien, but the EIR nee~ net be as detailed as an.EIR en the specific cenStruC- tien preJect that might follew. (c) The requirements f~r an EIR en a lecal general plan er element thereef will be satisfie4 by the general plan er element decument, i~e., ne separate EIR will be required, if: (1) the generalsplan ad4resses all the peints required te be in an EIR by'~rticle 7 ef these Guidelines and (2) the decument contains a special sectien ~r a cover sheet ~identifying where the general plan decument a~dresses each of the peints re~uire~.