Laserfiche WebLink
PART [I: DEMONSTRATION OF EQUIVALENT STRINGENCY <br /> <br />Directions <br /> <br />Each section or rule requiemeat that must be included in the local TRO is described on pages <br />3 through 13. Text shown in italics is discretionary, i.e. the local jurisdiction does not need to <br />include a similar provision or language in the TRO. Not including the provisions and lang,,~go <br />in italics in the 'FRO does not reduec the stringency of the ordinance. In many cases, omission <br />of this language would make the TRO more siringeat than the Diswict rule. Statomcnts that <br />appear in UPPER C.4SE fTALICS are explanatory notes. <br /> <br />Directly below each rule section or requir~raent the local jurisdiction must identify the TRO <br />section number(s) in which an equivalent requirement appears. Space is provided to explain; if <br />necessary, how the TKO section is equally or mor~ suingcat than the Regulation 13, Kule 1 <br />requiremeaL In SOme Sections, specific questions must b~ answered. Please attach additional <br />sheets, if necessary. <br /> <br />P~e2 <br /> <br /> <br />