Laserfiche WebLink
Pleasanton's retail sales tax revenues, which comprise our second largest source of funding <br />for general city services such as public safety, public works, parks and community services. <br />Hotel/Motel Taxes <br />The City assesses a transient occupancy tax of 8% on all dwellings occupied less than 30 <br />days. There are 1,792 hotel/motel rooms in the City, with approximately 171 more expected <br />to be added in 2001. With the booming economy, hotel tax revenues are increasing slightly <br />more than staff projected. For Midyear 1999 -00, staff increased the projection by $60,000. <br />Similarly, for 2000 -01, staff is increasing the projection by $44,000 (1.2 to $3.7 million. <br />Business J.icense Taxes <br />During the Midyear review of 1999 -00, Business License Tax revenue projections were <br />increased by $152,000 to $2.2 million based on collections to date. Similarly, another <br />$291,000 is being added to the original 2000 -01 projection, bringing its total to $2.4 million. <br />The 2000 -01 projection represents an expected increase of 9% over the current year (1999- <br />00), and a 15.5% increase over 1998 -99. <br />Documentary Transfer Taxes <br />While the market value of resale homes has been on a steady rise this last year, fewer homes <br />are on the market and being resold than in many previous years. Therefore, the transfer tax <br />assessed when a property changes hands is not growing like property taxes are. In fact, staff <br />projects these taxes will be slightly less next fiscal year (2000 -01) than they were a year ago <br />(1998 -99). However, when the budget was adopted last spring, staff estimated that the <br />revenue would continue to grow. Therefore, the projection is now being reduced by <br />$123,000, to $600,000. <br />State Vehicle License Fees (VLF) <br />Vehicle license fees are a subvention received from the State in lieu of property taxes on <br />motor vehicles. The subvention allocation is determined by population. With the current <br />good economy, the City has seen a growth in these revenues. While the State has been <br />holding to their promise of reducing this tax over time to the public, they have to date, <br />backfilled the revenue to cities, so that the State, not the cities, is impacted by the reduction. <br />However, this backfill is not constitutionally protected, and thus is not guaranteed in the <br />future, especially if the State economy falters. <br />The City is currently losing over $4 million per year due to the "ERAF" shifts of property tax <br />revenues that the State implemented during the recession of the early and mid 1990s. Over <br />the last ten years, staff estimates that the City has lost about $26 million to State funding <br />shifts. This loss was only partially "backfilled" with Proposition 172 Public Safety Sales Tax <br />MEI <br />6 <br />