My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 00029
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
RES 00029
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2001 7:55:20 PM
Creation date
3/27/2000 11:26:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/21/2000
DOCUMENT NO
RES 00029
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3, That the proposed annexation will penrot the logical and efficient provision of essenuai <br /> mumcipal ~'pe services to the terr/ton., by *,,he City, of Pleasanton: <br /> <br />10. <br /> <br />11. <br /> <br />12. <br /> <br />13. <br /> <br />14. <br /> <br />15. <br /> <br />16. <br /> <br />17. <br /> <br />That affected local agencies have given their wrmen assurance as to their abili~' to provide said <br />municipal services: <br /> <br />That the subject ternto~. is inhabited pursuant to the Cortese-i'(nox Act as it contains 2~.~ <br />registered voters as of the date of this hearing; <br /> <br />That, in accordance with the provisions of Revenue and Taxation Code section 99, the City of <br />Pleasanton by Resolution dated September 15, 1998 and the County. of Alameda by Resolution <br />dated November 17. 1998 have reached agreement on an exchange of property tax revenues: <br /> <br />That the change of organization proposal is consistent with the adopted General Plan and <br />Specific Plan of the City of Pleasanton: <br /> <br />That the City of Pleasanton has prezoned the terntoO' in conformance with Commission policy: <br /> <br />That the factors as set forth in Government Code section 56841 have been reviewed and <br />considered by the Commission: <br /> <br />That the Cky of Pleasamon's Plan For Municipal Sen'ices contains nil of the requisite <br />information as required by Government Code section 5665,~ and has been considered and found <br />adequate by this Corn.mission and is incorporated herein by reference: <br /> <br />That the Froposed annexation is consistent with the orderly. planned and efficient urban <br />deveiopmem of the area and consistent with the City of Pleasanton's Urban Growth Boundary <br />line: <br /> <br />That while this proposal can reasonably be expected to lead to the conversion of existing open <br />space pursuant to Government Code section 56377 it's preservation would not promote the <br />planned. orderly. effic~ient de:'elopmem of the area: <br /> <br />That less than 100% of the property ox~ hers in the proposed territory have given their consent to <br />this annexation: <br /> <br />That the boundaries of the proposed terntory are definite. consistent and appropriate and that no <br />islands or corridors of unincorporated terntop... are created: <br /> <br />That the policies. findings and mitigation measures as set forth in the adopted Citv of Pleasanton <br />Happy Valley Specific Plan and General Plan are herein incorporated by reference: <br /> <br />That an Environmental Impact Report for the Happy Valley Specific Plan was prepared and <br />certified by the City of Pleasanton. as lead agency. and the annexation of areas ar~ within the <br />scope of the Final EIR: and <br /> <br />That the CiLv of Pleasanton adopted EIR was reviewed and considered by this Commission prior <br />to action on this proposal. <br /> <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.