Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />COUNTY OF ALAMEDA <br />STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br />RESOLUTION NO. 77-47 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING A NOVEMBER BOND ELECTION FOR <br />THE WASTE WATER DISPOSAL PROJECT TO BE SELECTED BY <br />THE LIVERMORE-AMADOR VALLEY WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />the Livermore-Amador Valley Water Management Agency is a <br />joint exercise of powers agency created by the Cities of <br />Livermore and Pleasanton and the Valley Community Services <br />District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />said agency was created for the purpose of establishing <br />a waste water management system for the Livermore~-Amador <br />Valley; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />said agency has been endeavoring to select a project which <br />is the most cost effective project in order to obtain <br />state and federal financing which will pay for 87 1/2% <br />of the cost of the selected project; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />the board of directors of the Livermore-Amador Valley <br />Water Management Agency at their meeting of February 17, <br />1977, received a staff report indicating that there were <br />three options available to the agency with respect Lo <br />placing a bond measure before the voters (a) a May, <br />1977, election consisting of a broadly worded ballot <br />measure which would not include reclamation and does not <br />specify the export pipeline route; (b) a May, 1977, <br />election for approval of financing of the export pipeline <br />over Boehmer Summit to the East Bay Discharger Authority <br />facility which would not include reclamation; and (c) a <br />November, 1977 election consisting of a specifically <br />worded ballot measure describing a project selected bly <br />the board at the end of March, 1977, which would incfLu<~e <br />a reclamation project; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS~ <br /> <br />the Livermore-Amador Valley Water Management Agent? boarot <br />of directors requested each agency's governing boara <br />consi,~er the above alternatives in order that a <br />~ination could be made at a special meeting ef the <br />board of directors to be held on Friday~ February 25,1977' <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />the City Council of tI~e City of Pleasanton at an adjourned <br />regular meeting held on February 24~ 1977 considered the <br />three alternatives set forth in the s~aff report to the <br />LAVW~ board of directors, as well as comments by the <br />City staff on t~e alternatives available to the City <br />Council; <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF T}IE CITY OF PLEASANTON DOES <br />RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />Section 1. Supports alternative (c) of the staff report to the <br /> LA~MA board of directors which would place on the <br /> <br /> <br />