RES 77254 - Laserfiche WebLink

WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, CITY OF PLEASANTON COUNTY OF ALAMEDA STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO, 77-254 A RESOLUTION DENYING THE AppEAL OF ROBERT J. MYERS TO A DECISION OF THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING THAT AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT BE pREpARED FOR 119 UNIT RETIREMENT FACILITY on August 19, 1977, Robert J. Myers filed an application (PUD- 77-7~ to rezOne a 12.7 acre parcel of land located immediately south of the terminus of Las Lomitas Drive and east of PleasT anton School from the A (Agricultural) District to the PUD (Planned Unit DeVelopment, medium density) District and to approve a development plan for the site consisting of 119 unit limited care retirement facility; and the planning Division of the Department of Conununity Develop~ ment prepared an initial study pursuant to the Environmental Impact Guidelines and Procedures of the City of Pleasanton adopted by Resolution 77~66 on February 28, 1977; and after making said initial study; the Director of Planning determined that an Environmental Impact Report should be prepared for the proposed project; and the applicant has appealed the determination of the Director of Planning to the City Council of the City of Pleasanton pursuant to Section 5.6 of the aforementioned guidelines; and the City Council at its meeting of September 20, 1~77 received a report of September 14, 1977 from the Director Of Planning regarding this appeal to which was attached the initial study upon which the Director of Planning determined an Environmental Impact Report should be prepared together with answers to the "Yes" and "Maybe" portions of the initial study; and the City Council was advised by the City Attorney of the pro- visions of Section 5.6 of the City Council's guidelines regard~ ing procedure to be undertaken by the City Council in consider- ing the appeal; and the City Attorney also pointed out tO the City Council that in making this determinatipn, the City Council should be guided by the provisions of Section 5,2, 5.3 and 5.5 of the afore- mentioned guidelines in order to determine if the project would have a significant effect upon the environment; and the City Council opened a public hearing and took testimony from all interested members of the public desiring to speak to the City Council regarding the proposed appeal; and upon termination of the public hearing, the City Council deliberated upon the information which it had received from the public during the public hearing, from the Director of Planning as set forth in the September 14, 1977 memorandum as well as the initial study attached thereto and the pro- visions of the Environmental Impact Guidelines and Procedures of the City Council which were before the City Council at the time of deliberation.