Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> COUNTY OF ALAMEDA <br /> STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 79-72 <br /> <br />APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED AND <br />FILED UNDER APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PUD-78-1 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />the City Council of the City of Pleasanton met on April 24, <br />1979, and held a public hearing on the application for <br />PUD-78-1; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />that application provides for a hillside development plan <br />for a 10-lot single-family residential subdivision on an <br />approximately 50-acre site located northwesterly of the <br />existing terminus of Longview Drive; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, an environmental impact report was prepared and submitted <br /> to the City Council along with the application; <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RESOLVES <br />AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />Section 1. Council finds that the environmental impact report pre- <br /> pared is complete, sufficient and acceptable for the pro- <br /> ject proposed. <br /> <br />Section 2~ That the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered <br /> the information contained in the environmental impact report. <br /> <br />Section 3. The City Council makes the following findings: <br /> <br />(1) <br /> <br />That the Environmental Impact Report for the proposed <br />project has been completed in compliance with the' <br />California Environmental Quality Act and state guide- <br />lines. <br /> <br />(2) <br /> <br />That the City Council has reviewed and considered the <br />information contained in the Environmental Impact <br />Report prior to the approval of the project. <br /> <br />(3) That the Environmental Impact Report sets forth, at <br /> page 30, eleven unavoidable adverse impacts. <br /> <br />(4) <br /> <br />That the project as conditioned by the Planning Com- <br />mission and the City Council will significantly miti- <br />gate all listed impacts except "that the project would <br />disrupt a natural woodland habitat in this area." <br /> <br />(5) <br /> <br />The over-all value to the community of having the pro- <br />posed hillside planned development project with forty- <br />one acres of open space and the elimination of the <br />existing erosion pattern on the hillside in the area <br />are overriding considerations permitting the disrup- <br />tion of the woodland habitat in this area. <br /> <br /> <br />