My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 79149
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1970-1979
>
1979
>
RES 79149
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2012 3:43:56 PM
Creation date
3/14/2000 4:21:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/11/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 79-149 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION AMENDING APPENDIX B OF THE RESIDENTIAL <br />ALLOCATION PROGRAM SELECTION CRITERIA "MANDATORY <br />SYSTEM ELEMENTS" ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 78-52 <br /> <br />THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />Section 1. <br /> <br /> Appendix B of the Residential Allocation Program Selec- <br />tion Criteria "Mandatory System Elements is hereby amended <br />to read as follows: <br /> <br />INCENTIVE SYSTEM ELEMENTS <br /> <br />Those residential developments not exempt from the residential allo- <br />cation review process will be reviewed and ranked by total number of <br />"residential allocation program points." The criteria upon which dev- <br />elopment proposals will be judged and the RAP points available under <br />each criteria are listed below. <br /> <br />Environmental Concerns (Total points possible 44) <br /> <br />1. Design 0 to 15 points <br /> <br />-Extent to which the proposal's design is superior. <br /> <br />Note: <br /> <br />"Design" includes, but is not limited to, the <br />following: (a) architectural design quality; <br /> (b) site design quality, on- and <br /> off-site; <br /> (c) usable open space; <br /> (d) amenities included. <br /> <br />2. Traffic Circulation <br /> <br />0 to 10 points <br /> <br />-Extent to which the traffic generated by the proposal <br />would utilize the major thoroughfares planned to carry <br />the traffic and the extent to which these thoroughfares <br />are completed to their design size. <br /> <br />Note: Major thoroughfares include the following: <br /> <br />Stoneridge Drive, Foothill Road, West Las Positas <br />Boulevard, Bernal Avenue, Hopyard Road, Valley <br />Avenue, Santa Rita Road, Del Valle Parkway, Pico <br />Avenue, Sunol Boulevard, and Division Street-St. <br />Marys Street. <br /> <br />The analysis will follow the path of a hypothet- <br />ical driver along the planned routes from the <br />development site to the Central Business District <br />and to the closest planned freeway interchange. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.