My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 84629
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
RES 84629
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2012 4:38:07 PM
Creation date
2/1/2000 12:23:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/11/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUMMARY OF ISSUES TO 8E ADDRESSED BY THE RESIDENTIAL REVIEW GOMMITTEE (1> <br /> <br />WHAT SHOULD CONSTITUTE A "BALANCE AMONG LAND USES" <br /> <br />A. Size Of The Community <br /> <br />B, The Relationship Between Jobs And HOusing <br /> <br />C. Community Character <br /> <br />IN PLEASANTON? <br /> <br />2. WHAT TYPES OF HOUSING WILL PLEASANTON NEED IN THE FUTURE AND WHERE SHOULD <br /> THEY BE LOCATED? <br /> <br /> A. Housing Type <br /> <br /> B. Housing Tenure (Owner vs. Renter) <br /> <br /> C. Housing Density And Household Size <br /> <br /> D. Housing Affordability <br /> <br /> E. Potential Housing Locations <br /> <br />3. WHAT RATE OF RESIDENTIAL GROWTH WOULD BEST SERVE PLEASANTON'S HOUSING NEEDS <br /> IN THE FUTURE? <br /> <br /> A, Population Benchmarks <br /> <br /> B. Growth Management Program <br /> <br />4. WHAT MECHANISMS SHOULD 8E USED TO IMPLEMENT THE RESIDENTIAL REVIEW <br /> COMMtTTEE'S RECOMMENDATIONS? <br /> <br />~i) See, City Of Pleasanton, Workinq Paper ~2: ~n~ral Plap IssUe~ and <br />information, November 27, 1984, pp. 4 - 18 <br /> <br />-1- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.