RES 85148 - Laserfiche WebLink

each Antonini and Pleasanton of a dismissal of the complaint in the case of City of Pleasanton, et al. vs. Joseph Antonini, et a]. in the County of Alameda Superior Court, case number H-97407- 1 and in consideration of Antonini~s agreement to hold harmless and indemnify Pleasanton from any claim or claims by Thornley W. Goe, his successors or assigns or any lessee claiming through him, arising out of or in connection with the aforesaid complaint. in Eminent Domain, the parties agree as follows: 1. Each of the above mentioned parties on behalf itself, its decendants, ancestors, dependants, heirs, executors, admini- strators and assigns, and agents, servants, st'~kholders, em- ployees, representatives, assigns, and successors, hereby fully. releases and discharges the other party and its decendants, ancestors, dependants, heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns and agents, servants, stockholders, employees, represen- tatives, assigns and successors, from all rights, claims, and actions which each party and its above mentioned successors now have against the other party and its above mentioned successors stemming from their differences arising out of the complaint in eminent domain filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, action number H-97407-1. 2. This settlement is the compromise of the above mentioned ~isputed claim and shall never be treated as an admission of liability b~ either party for any purpose. 3. This compromise settlement, not withstanding Section 1542 of the California Civil Code which provides that: "A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the 2