My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN101999
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCMIN101999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:17 AM
Creation date
2/1/2000 6:58:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/19/1999
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lila Bringhurst, 990 Sycamore Road, indicated she had purchased the Frost <br />property and believed the parcel had a designated density. That is now gone. Does that <br />mean other elements of the North Sycamore Specific Plan, such as privacy, will also be <br />gone? She was amazed staff could spend ten years designing a plan for 69 units that is <br />now reduced to 48 units. It seems the cost for off-site improvements is $100,000 per <br />house. We have to have some concern about the cost to future residents of Pleasanton. <br />She felt these houses will be over a million dollars. She agreed Council should vote <br />tonight on these projects. She believed the density should be raised to 51 units. There <br />have been many vocal neighbors who have fought for themselves. This proposal is <br />worthy of a positive vote and let New Cities get on with its plan. <br /> <br /> Mark Silliman, 954 Hopkins Way, was impressed with the neighborhood support <br />of the North Sycamore Specific Plan and asked for consideration on the trail and access <br />road. <br /> <br /> Chris Peterson, 5213 Independence Drive, agreed with a density of 48 homes and <br />stated the only issues are the trail and access road. He was concerned about privacy. <br /> <br />There being no further speakers, the Mayor closed the public heating. <br /> <br />Ms. Ayala asked why a gravel road is needed to the creek if it is to be improved. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift replied that ongoing maintenance is necessary as well as emergency <br />access which may be required in the winter, when the ground on the hillside will be soft. <br />There has been flooding in that creek in the past. The key issue is at the border of this <br />property and the Ventana Hills subdivision where it goes into a large pipe and anything <br />that obstructs that pipe will cause a flood in Ventana Hills, so being able to reach that <br />inlet is a key issue. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala inquired about the safety of the creek. If an access road is completed, <br />will that be any less safe than any other access to creeks that we have in Pleasanton. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said safety has to do with steepness of the bank. The bank will be <br />improved in such a way that it will be flattened a bit. There are many agencies that have <br />to issue permits for this and how it will be stabilized is not clear at this point. The project <br />is conditioned to construct bank stabilization and it is hoped that would reduce the <br />severity of the drop off at the bank. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver inquired about the suggestion made to lay gravel and let the grasses <br />grow through it. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift stated that staff prefers to have an all weather road. It is not certain it <br />will stay looking like a gravel road for long. The area will be landscaped with trees and <br />grass rather than shrubs that were in the original conditions. The road will not be visible <br />from the yards of the existing homes. The neighbors are concemed that if there is a road <br /> <br /> 15 10/19/99 <br />Pleasanton City Council <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.