CCMIN022195 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Rossi stated that would be possible. Historically, the senior discount for the sewer is different than the water. Staff tried a lifeline rate for water, but that cannot be done for sewer because sewer use is not measured at the household level. Ms. Mohr did not believe that just because someone reaches senior citizen status that the City should subsidize the utility bills. For those who do need assistance, she urged maximum consideration. Ms. Rossi indicated a senior household would typically be smaller. If they do not meet the low-income criteria, they will still pay the same price because they are paying the flat rate as applied to a full family. The concept is different than with water rates because the actual use is measured, but with sewer the assumption is that all households are the same. Ms. Michelotti asked whether every senior takes advantage of the discount. Ms. Rossi indicated that only 1200 seniors claim the discount and that does not include every senior in town. It was moved by Mr. Pico, seconded by Ms. Dennis, to adopt Resolution No. 95-21, adopting the 1995 Sewer Rates as set forth in the staff report; and introducing Ordinance No. 1651, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, amending the Pleasanton Municipal Code concerning sewer rates and charges. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers - Dennis, Michelotti, Mohr, Pico, and Mayor Tarver NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Item 7d Proposed 1995 Water Rates (SR95:68) Randall Lum presented the staff report. Mr. Pico requested clarification on the discount for the School District. Mr. Lure indicated the Council had previously made the decision to phase out the 20% discount for the School District. Last year the rate was reduced to 10% and this year the discount will be removed entirely. Ms. Mohr inquired if the irrigation rate could apply to residences that have vineyards on the property. 02/21/95 - 14-