My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN021699
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCMIN021699
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:17 AM
Creation date
3/31/1999 11:11:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/16/1999
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Item 6e <br />Matters related to the Happy Valley Golf Course project and annexation. (SR99:41 ) <br /> <br /> Randall Lum presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Karen Frost, Chairman of the Golf Committee, explained the values about this project, the <br />time line, and the budget. She is very proud of the work the architects have done in preserving the <br />habitats, while maintaining the integrity of the golf course, to bring forth a golf course the City can <br />be proud of. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti understood the golf course had been redesigned to accommodate the <br />environmental issues. She asked if the golf committee was comfortable with the redesign. <br /> <br /> Ms. Frost said the committee was comfortable with the redesign. Actually one of the holes <br />in the redesign is more exciting than the original design. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico asked for clarification for the allocation of water and sewer costs comparing staff' s <br />recommendation to the Allsat Improvement Association proposal. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lnm said the difference is that the cost for an existing home is reduced by $13,000 for <br />sewer and water, but the cost increases by about $5500 for future homes. It adds about $210,000 to <br />the cost of the golf course. He explained that the budget for the golf course already has this cost, <br />because the cost to install the core facilities is already included in the golf course budget. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico thought the $18,000,000 would be recovered by selling twenty-four lots. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lnm said the expected bond revenues, the reimbursement for the infrastructure costs for <br />the twenty-four lots and the previous advances from the CIP and water and sewer fund, total <br />$18,000,000. The other costs for the 24 lots is under the land cost of the project and is not part of <br />the $18,000,000. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico asked how much of the $18,000,000 is related to the twenty-four homes. <br /> <br /> Dave Iremonger, Treasury Supervisor, said the twenty-four home sites will be available to <br />the property owners to pay for the City's purchase of the land. When the twenty-four homes hook <br />up to the infrastructure, $1.49 million will come back to the City. The bond sale, the twenty-four <br />homes' paying their share of the infrastructure, and the advances make up the $18,000,000. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico asked if the City will own the twenty-four home sites? <br /> <br /> Mr. Iremonger said no. One of the things referenced in the staff report is that there will be a <br />proposed change to the MOU with the property owners who own the golf course property. That <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 21 02/16/99 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.