Laserfiche WebLink
Pleasanton Gateway Environmental Checklist <br /> Less 'Khan <br />Potentially Significant Lcss'I~han <br />Significant With Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues (continued) Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />v) Other public facilities? <br />Discussion <br /> <br />a-e) The project developer will contribute to the construction of schools/school facilities through the <br />payment of school impact tees. Police, Fire, Park and related service capacities exist to ade- <br />quately serve the project and will be mitigated through the design phase of the project to meet <br />the current City development standards. Therefore, this would be a no-impact. <br />14. RECREATION <br />Environmental Setting <br />The project site is will not be providing on-site parkland. <br />Standards of Significance <br />For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposed project <br />would: <br />• Result in the failure to meet City standards for the provision of parkland. <br /> Less 'Phan <br />Potentially Significant Less'rhan <br />Significant With Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues Impact Incorporated Impact hnpac[ <br />Recreation <br />Would the project: <br />a) Would the project increase the use of existing neigh- ~ ~ ~ ~X <br />borhood and regional parks or other recreational facili- <br />ties such that substantial physical deterioration of the <br />facility would occur or be accelerated? <br />b) Does the project include recreational facilities or re- ~ ~ ~ ^X <br />quire the construction or expansion of recreational fa- <br />cilities, which might have an adverse physical effect <br />on the environment? <br />Discussion <br />a-b) The proposed development will not accelerate the substantial deterioration of existing facilities <br />near the subject site. Therefore, this would be a no-impact. <br />Pleasanton Gateway Initial Study Page 32 of 37 November 8, 2006 <br />