PC 05/12/1993 - Laserfiche WebLink

~ that the applicant does have some freedom in choosing colors. How ver, he must submit the choice of color to the Planning Director. He added that the Commi sion can change the guidelines if they desire. Commissioner Pinch felt that if other units on the streets adhere to that it would not be wise to change the guidelines. He thought it the situation. e existing guidelines t to let staff deal with Discussion ensued in regard to Condition 5 and the color scheme. I was concluded that the second sentence of that condition should be deleted. A motion was made by COmm;ll.~i.oner Michelotti, seconded by C mm;ll.~ioner Wright fmding that the project would have an insignificant adverse effi on the environment and a De M;n;m;ll. impact on the site's wildlife, and approving th Negative Declaration prepared Cor Case Z-93-15. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: COmm;ll.~toners Mahern, McGuirk, Michelotti, Wri t and Chairman Hovingh None None None NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Resolution No. PC-93-21 was entered and adopted approving the Negative Declaration prepared Cor Case Z-93-1S. A motion was made by Comm;ll.Sioner Michelotti, seconded by C mm;ll.~ioner McGuirk approving Case Z-93-1S subject to the conditions listed in Exhibi B, with the Collowing modification: o Condition 5 - Delete the second sentence which rea : "This color scheme shall include a lighter wall color with a dark trim (.e., bellyband, eaves, etc.) and window color." ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: COmm;ll.~toners Mahern, McGuirk, Michelotti, Wri t and Chairman Hovingh NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. PC-93-22 was entered and adopted approving C Z-93-1S as motioned. r Planning Commission Minutes May 12, 1993 Page 6