CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 4-21-26

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 2 2) 3/9/25- Deployed ARV in response to a disturbance and subject who was reported to have a large rifle. 3) 6/22/25- Deployed ARV in response to a disturbance and a subject who reportedly was armed with a shotgun. 4) 8/15/25-Deployed ARV in response to a confirmed shooting/homicide. Agenda Item #23: Receive an update on the Groundwater Supply Project and approve joint Project implementation with Zone 7 Water Agency 3. How does the report compare to the Brown & Caldwell report presented to the City Council on 10/17/2023? A. Slides 8-10 of the 4/21/26 presentation have been updated to reflect the comparison between the two reports. The current cost-benefit analysis of implementing the new groundwater wells in the Bernal subbasin jointly with Zone 7 or independently has capital cost estimates of $27 million and $35 million (in 2026 dollars), respectively. These capital costs are within the range of the cost estimate for the same project from the Water Supply Assessment (WSA). For annualized costs, the WSA did a relative comparison that only quantified the "differential" annualized costs between the project alternatives. The current analysis does a more "totalized" estimate of annualized costs as it was necessary to properly compare implementing the project jointly with Zone 7 vs. independently. Although the new annualized costs cannot be directly compared to the previous WSA study, there were no changes in assumptions that would impact the previous WSA analysis and findings. Agenda Item #25: Introduce an ordinance amending Chapter 18.110 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code, adopt a resolution adopting new policies related to applications for wireless facilities (macro towers, small cells, and modifications to existing facilities), and adopt a resolution updating the Master Fee Schedule by adding wireless application fee 4. Does the proposed ordinance and policy structure, which puts the majority of regulating standards into the three policies, versus the ordinance, provide adequate ability to the City to enforce the various standards? Should certain standards, such as noticing requirements, findings for denial, or distance from residential structures, be made more stringent?