Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF PLEASANTON, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />11 | eidebailly.com <br />ASSESSMENT OF RELATED FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES <br /> <br />Although the scope of services primarily focused on assessing the City’s existing financial forecast, during the <br />course of our assessment we identified related observations regarding financial management practices that merit <br />mention. These observations are summarized in the table below. <br /> <br />NO. OBSERVATION DISCUSSION <br />1 <br />The level and type of information <br />shared with the City Council and the <br />community is very detailed, which <br />can at times make it difficult to <br />focus on key information. <br />We observed that the staff reports and presentations provided to the <br />City Council and community related to financial information often <br />contain great detail in some areas and information without sufficient <br />supporting detail in others. In our experience, effectively <br />communicating complex financial information is one of the most <br />difficult tasks for finance officers. To improve clarity, critical <br />information should be distilled into key points and graphics, and more <br />details supporting information should be provided in an appendix or <br />upon request. Learning from the approach of peer jurisdictions and/or <br />employing the assistance of GFOA or consultants to focus on this issue <br />would be of great benefit to the City. <br />2 <br />The City’s current Internal Service <br />Fund Reserve Policies set reserves as <br />a percentage of expenditures. <br />The City’s reserve policies for internal service funds for facility and <br />infrastructure replacement are currently set as a percentage of <br />expenditures. It is a best practice to use a cash flow analysis of future <br />expenditures, such as what will be included in the City’s infrastructure <br />replacement plan, to identify the annual funding requirements and <br />arrive at an annual contribution amount that will avoid a negative <br />balance in each fund during the forecast period. The minimum reserve <br />balance is then less important rather than that the analysis be <br />undertaken to ensure that reserves are adequate in each year during <br />the forecast period. This change will also facilitate illustrating why the <br />full amount of funding included in these funds is necessary and not <br />available for other purposes as the cash flow analysis will indicate that <br />the funds are fully programmed in future years. <br />3 <br />The City is not currently utilizing <br />funds in its Section 115 Trust for <br />UAL-related pension payments. <br />The City is not currently utilizing funds in the Section 115 Trust to make <br />payments toward its unfunded accrued liability (UAL). Based on the <br />analysis undertaken by the City’s actuary and discussions with the City, <br />we believe it is appropriate to begin drawing down on these funds on a <br />limited basis during the forecast period as part of the baseline forecast <br />rather than as a balancing measure. This is an appropriate use of the <br />funds as the City’s pension plan matures and will serve to reduce the <br />structural deficit while illustrating to the community that these funds <br />are being utilized as intended. <br />Page 20 of 33