Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF PLEASANTON, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />9 | eidebailly.com <br />NO. OBSERVATION DISCUSSION <br />7 <br />The City has put in place a <br />framework of regular forecast <br />updates and public reviews of the <br />forecast. <br />A key element of successful long-term financial planning consistent <br />with best practices is to make regular updates to the financial forecast <br />and to present it on a regular basis to leadership and the governing <br />body. The City has implemented these practices and continues to <br />refine its process and practices relative to the financial forecast to <br />enhance its utility and accuracy. <br />8 <br />The forecast would benefit from <br />projecting revenues and <br />expenditures that behave uniquely <br />as individual line items in the <br />detailed staff version of the <br />forecast. <br />As currently constructed, the forecast (in most cases) forecasts <br />groupings of accounts at a higher level such as all salaries or all fees. <br />As a best practice, and as a means of illustrating the thoroughness of <br />the forecasting undertaken to stakeholders, an analysis should be <br />undertaken to identify those revenues and expenditures that could <br />benefit from further detailed projections. For example, salaries can <br />be forecasted by bargaining unit to reflect current labor contracts and <br />fees can be forecasted by category to account for unique growth <br />trends. With this detail in the staff forecast, presentation of the <br />information in its current form, in most settings, would still be <br />appropriate to avoid too much detail. <br />9 <br />The City has acknowledged its non- <br />General Fund infrastructure and <br />operations needs and is focused on <br />addressing them. <br />Although the primary focus of this engagement was an assessment of <br />the General Fund financial forecast, we did peripherally look at the <br />City’s other funds, in particular its enterprise funds. We noted that <br />recent rate increases have improved the health of the City’s water <br />fund but that there are still additional needs in these funds that the <br />City is in the process of cataloging to be discussed and addressed in <br />the future. <br />10 <br />The financial forecast does not <br />include illustrative charts and <br />graphs or historical data. <br />Typically, a forecast includes historical data for 2-5 years to illustrate <br />trends and facilitate comparisons with the forecast data. Additionally, <br />graphical depictions of data such as a line graph of historical and <br />projected revenues by category can be useful in presentations and <br />facilitate communication of complex information. <br />11 <br />The City has proactively set aside <br />funds for Pension and OPEB <br />liabilities in trust funds. <br />Many California cities have and continue to contribute the minimum <br />amount to CalPERS and are funding their OPEB obligations on a pay- <br />as-you-go basis. The City has proactively set aside funds for these <br />important needs that are earning interest and will decrease long-term <br />costs for the City. <br />Page 18 of 33