My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Appendix A - EIR Noticing and Public Involvement COMBINED
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2025
>
12-10
>
ITEM 5 EXHIBIT A
>
Appendix A - EIR Noticing and Public Involvement COMBINED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2025 4:27:25 PM
Creation date
12/2/2025 3:54:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Hidden Canyon Residences and Preserve Project EIR <br />City of PleasanttJn Notice of Preparation <br />• Public Services and Recreation-The project would include the development of new <br />housing that will increase the demand for public services, including police, fire, and schools. <br />The project will also include the dedication of open space lands for development by EBRPD, <br />including a new staging area and trail that would be developed along the southern boundary <br />of the site adjacent to Devaney Creek. <br />• Transportation -Although the proposed project is not expected to generate traffic volumes <br />at a level that would create impacts to nearby roadways or intersections, the CEQA analysis <br />must include a comprehensive traffic analysis that considers aspects such as roadway design <br />and safety, and effects on increased traffic volumes on Dublin Canyon Road, and analysis of <br />proposed bicycle lane improvements. A vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis will also be <br />provided. <br />• Water and Wastewater Systems -The proposed project would require extension of public <br />water and wastewater systems on-site. The EIR will consider operational components of the <br />off-site water supply and wastewater collection systems that would serve the proposed <br />project; the City is currently undertaking analysis of the water supply and distribution system <br />in the vicinity of the proposed project to determine if system improvements or modifications <br />are necessary. If the analysis determines expansion or modification of City facilities are <br />needed, the environmental impacts of those project components must be analyzed in the EIR. <br />Considering existing conditions on the project site, it is anticipated that the following <br />resource categories will not require detailed analysis and instead will be addressed una.er an <br />Effects Found not to be Significant chapter of the EIR: <br />• Agriculture and Forestry Resources -Some grazing is currently ongoing at the project <br />site; however, the project site is not designated as important farmland under the California <br />Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program and the project site is not subject to a <br />Williamson Act contract. As such, the proposed project is not expected to result in significant <br />environmental effects. <br />• Mineral Resources -There are no known mineral resources located on or adjacent to the <br />project site and the nearest mineral resource recovery site is located approximately 7.0 miles <br />southeast. As such, the proposed project would not result in significant effects related to <br />mineral resources. <br />• Population and Housing-The proposed project site is currently developed with two <br />residential homes and related structures located on the south side of Devaney Creek. Both <br />homes are owned by the Lester family. The proposed project includes demolition of the two <br />homes and replacement with two new homes on the south side of Devaney Creek; an <br />additional 29 homes would be constructed in the central portion of the site on the north side <br />of Devaney Creek. <br />Approximately 43.85 acres of the site is currently designated for low-density residential <br />development in the General Plan, with a maximum density of 1.99 units per gross acre. This <br />land use designation suggests that the General Plan buildout assumed up to 87 dwelling units, <br />which indicates that the proposed development of 29 lots was already accounted for in the <br />FirstCarbon Solutions 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.