SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS - Laserfiche WebLink

It’s unclear if PUSD plans a private park just for Neal residents, or a park that’s open to all. A public park would match the City’s previous plans: ● The Vineyard Corridor Specific Plan called for a 20-acre Community Park that has never materialized. ● As many of the undersigned residents were aware of, and as Concilmember Testa mentioned during the January 26th meeting, there was a promise made (in hindsight apparently non-binding) that if the Neal property didn’t become a school it would become a park. ● The City’s “Parks and Rec Master Plan” on page 34 says "Ideally, everyone in the City would live within convenient walking distance (typically one-half mile) of a Neighborhood Park." Tawny Park is the closest Neighborhood Park to the Vineyard Corridor. It's about 1.5 to 2 miles away from most Vineyard Corridor Subarea 2 and 3 residents, which is not really walkable. With the dump site unavailable due to the methane issue, the rezoning of the Neal property might be the only foreseeable opportunity for Vineyard Corridor residents to get access to a Neighborhood Park. The Neal Property is within half a mile of basically all Vineyard Corridor Subarea 2 and 3 residents. We ask the City to incentivise the landowner to make some of the 3 acres of open space into a Neighborhood Park. For example the City could offer to build and maintain the park, which could provide value for the landowner in reducing development cost and reducing HOA fees. This might also involve the City acquiring the land for the Park from the landowner. The Vineyard Corridor residents have paid fees and decades of taxes that were meant to go towards the 20 acre Community Park. We think using some of those monies for a small (say 1.5 acre) Neighborhood park would be fair. We’re also concerned about the proposed location of the park. The attached PUSD letter proposes having the park on a strip of land next to Vineyard Ave. The letter depicts a playground next to the road on that strip. This plan completely disregards the realities of the vineyard corridor. The Neal property is located next to a 2-mile rural stretch of Vineyard Ave with no traffic lights or other traffic calming measures and a 45 mph speed limit. Cars routinely go 55 or 60 miles an hour along this stretch, and the lane adjacent to the proposed "park" has a curve with limited visibility right before the site. Placing a playground with children so close to such a road would be very dangerous and irresponsible. Such a park would not be used by any responsible parent or grandparent. Rather than a long, thin park along Vineyard Ave as PUSD proposed, we think it would be safer and more accessible to have the park on the other side of the property next to the Old Vineyard Trail . This would give walking and biking access to the park to Vineyard Corridor residents, and avoid the dangers of Vineyard Ave. June 1, 2023 5