Laserfiche WebLink
Other Cooperative Efforts <br />With respect to future efforts, the City is beginning an update to the Pedestrian and <br />Bicycle Master Plan, which will have a significant pedestrian focus with trips to and from <br />school as a high priority pedestrian activity. The update will incorporate the school site <br />assessments, mentioned above, into the future project list. It is anticipated that at least <br />three focus group meetings will be held with the schools to gather input on their needs. <br />PUSD held a number of public meetings around Walnut Grove Elementary and Harvest <br />Park Middle School to discuss the TK and other program expansions, while the <br />outreach was not specific to discussion regarding safe routes to school and traffic <br />congestion around schools, the majority of the public comments focused on these <br />topics. City staff attended several meetings to assist in answering the public's questions <br />and provide solutions where possible. <br />Summary/Conclusion <br />As outlined above, while the City (and the school district) has the ability and authority to <br />deploy and pay for school crossing guards, there is no legal requirement or obligation to <br />do so. Similarly, the City must maintain certain signage and traffic control around <br />schools, but there is no obligation to provide supplemental safety improvements or <br />measures. That said, both the City and PUSD share a commitment to ensuring that <br />Pleasanton students can travel to and from school in an environment that feels safe and <br />comfortable. In general, the City and the school district have worked proactively and <br />collaboratively to address the needs of the students. <br />In Pleasanton, past policy decisions have led to the current arrangement of the City <br />providing 100% of the funding for crossing guards at 22 locations. <br />However, and as described in other budget -related documentation, this condition is not <br />the case for many communities, which either take a shared cost approach, or have <br />school districts absorb the costs to provide crossing guards. As summarized in the table <br />below, a 2024 survey of other Alameda County jurisdictions indicated that, of the 11 <br />cities surveyed, six either had cost sharing or were 100% school district -funded. Five <br />were 100% city -funded, but of these, two noted that they were seeking to move toward <br />cost-sharing or more substantial school district funding. <br />City <br />Crossing Guard Funding Source <br />Alameda <br />City <br />Albany <br />City, but seeking cost-sharing with District <br />Berkeley <br />City <br />Dublin <br />Shared <br />Fremont <br />Shared <br />Hayward <br />District <br />3 of <br />