My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
031825 REGULAR
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2025 2:43:59 PM
Creation date
3/18/2025 2:36:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2025
EXPIRATION DATE
3/18/2045
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 4, 2025 <br />Page 14 <br /> <br />7357-016j <br /> <br />detectable levels of PFOS and PFOA, among other PFAS chemicals, in its water <br />supply wells. The City filed a lawsuit against 3M for its release, use, and storage of <br />PFAS products at and/or in the vicinity of the City’s water supplies.60 The <br />complaint alleged that 3M allowed PFOS, PFOA, and their chemical precursors to <br />enter the environment, and migrate through the soil, sediment, surface water, and <br />groundwater, thereby contaminating the City’s property groundwater wells. The <br />City and 3M e entered into a settlement agreement to cover the substantial costs of <br />removing these “forever chemicals” from the City’s water supply or finding alternate <br />water supply sources. <br /> <br />In September 2022, the Pleasanton City Council directed City staff to <br />suspend the evaluation of the PFAS Treatment and Wells Rehabilitation Project in <br />order to evaluate water supply alternatives that could replace the water previously <br />supplied by the City’s existing groundwater wells. The City has effectively <br />abandoned efforts to remediate wells due to PFAS contamination, and instead <br />considered other alternatives: “two alternatives involved water treatment solutions <br />and one examined the purchase of water from Zone 7 to meet all City drinking <br />water needs. The final option was the construction of two new groundwater wells <br />located within the Bernal subbasin in an area located outside of the influence of <br />PFAS contamination that would cost-effectively deliver to City residents high- <br />quality, reliable drinking water needs each year.”61 <br /> <br />The PFAS within the groundwater beneath the Project sites remains and it <br />does not appear the City is making any current efforts to remediate it. The DEIR’s <br />failure to mention, or include any substantive analysis, of the significant PFAS <br />contamination beneath the Project sites resulted in a failure to inform the public of <br />the Projects’ potentially significant environmental impacts. The Staff Report <br />addresses but does not resolve the issue of existing PFAS contamination beneath <br />the Project sites.62 The City must prepare a new DEIR, or revise and recirculate the <br />Arroyo Lago DEIR, to accurately measure and mitigate the PFAS contamination on <br />and adjacent to the Project sites. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />60 Id. <br />61 City of Pleasanton, News, Pleasanton City Council Approves Two New Water Wells to Meet Long - <br />Term Drinking Water Needs (Oct. 17, 2023), available at: <br />https://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/news/pleasanton-city-council-approves-two-new-water-wellsto- <br />meet-long-term-drinking-water-needs/. <br />62 Staff Report, p. 7 of 18.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.