Laserfiche WebLink
Page 8 of 10 <br />performance targets, including maintaining reserve balances and a minimum 125 percent debt <br />coverage ratio. By accelerating Priority A projects, this scenario proactively addresses critical <br />infrastructure risks, minimizing the likelihood of system failures. However, this approach <br />demands immediate staffing increases, requiring the City to recruit additional engineers and <br />planners to meet project delivery timelines. The concentration of major construction activities <br />within the first five years will likely cause significant traffic disruptions and temporary <br />inconveniences for residents. While this scenario offers long-term system stability and risk <br />reduction, it requires careful coordination and public outreach to mitigate near-term community <br />impacts. <br /> <br />The results are presented in Figure 4 below and in Attachment 4. <br /> <br />Figure 4 – Accelerate Scenario Model Results <br /> <br /> <br />Water Advisory Group Review <br />Financial plan scenarios were presented to the Water Advisory Group on Feburary 10. After <br />discussion with WRE and staff to address details about the development, the projects that are <br />included in each scenario, and the benefits and consequences of each scenario, the group <br />asked for a scenario somewhere in between Stabilize and Accelerate; this resulted in the <br />development of the Enhance scenario as follow up to that meeting. The Enhance Scenario is <br />supported by the Water Advisory Group and is in alignment with staff's recommendation. <br /> <br />Summary <br />The table below summarizes the financial analysis for the three scenarios—Stabilize, <br />Enhance, and Accelerate—along with the minimum recommended water revenue increases to <br />meet the water system's needs and the new debt issuance required to support each approach. <br /> <br />Page 10 of 27