My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PARKS AND RECREATION
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2025 10:21:11 AM
Creation date
2/6/2025 3:41:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/13/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
134 | CITY OF PLEASANTON URBAN FOREST MASTER PLAN <br />STATUS OF THE URBAN FOREST PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TREES <br />Tree condition of the City’s inventory varied, with roughly <br />12% rated as good, and 83% as fair, and 4% rated poor, <br />critical, or dead. The most common health defects observed <br />in these trees included drought stress, decay, and poor root <br />function, and various pest and pathogen problems. The <br />most common structure defects included cavities, dead <br />limbs or branches, leaning, topping, and issues with branch <br />unions and root systems. Table 2-11 shows that the relative <br />distribution of the various tree conditions is mostly the same <br />for all age categories. The only exception to this is that <br />immature age trees (the trees that have been most recently <br />planted by the City) have the highest relative percentage of <br />trees in ‘good’ condition at 22% (compared to 7% and 9% for <br />the other age categories) and the lowest relative percentage <br />of trees in ‘fair’ condition at 73% (compared to 83%, 87%, <br />and 88% for the other age categories). This distribution of <br />conditions makes sense for immature trees as 1) they should <br />be starting in a good condition coming straight from the tree <br />nursery, and 2) they haven’t developed mature canopies that <br />might have more obvious structural issues or outgrown their <br />planting spaces. Mortality of these immature trees is likely <br />between 1 and 5% depending on how many of these trees in <br />the ‘critical’ and ‘poor’ categories survive to maturity. <br />Table 2-10. Tree Conditions of the Pleasanton Inventory <br />Condition Number of Trees Percent <br />Good 2,934 12.4% <br />Fair 19,642 82.8% <br />Poor 803 3.4% <br />Critical 108 0.5% <br />Dead 159 0.7% <br />Source: City of Pleasanton Tree Inventory (Dudek 2024)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.