Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />methodology and thresholds. Mitigation measures would be identified, as appropriate, in <br />coordination with the City and BAAQMD to identify feasible mitigations for GHG emissions. <br /> <br />Biological Resources <br />The biological resources section will include a description of the potential effects to plant <br />communities, wildlife, and wetlands including adverse effects on rare, endangered, candidate, <br />sensitive, and special-status species from build-out of the proposed project. Raney’s analysis will <br />rely on the Biological Resources Report to be prepared by Monk, under contract with Raney (see <br />Attachment A for a complete scope of work). Monk will conduct a site visit and provide <br />documentation of all plants and animals observed or expected to occur on the project site. Monk <br />will also record habitats located on-site or within a zone of influence around the project site, <br />which could potentially support special-status plant or animal species. A biologist who <br />specializes in delineating waters of the U.S. and State will also evaluate the project site and will <br />map the approximate location of any federal or state jurisdictional waters present on-site. <br /> <br />Monk will then prepare a report, which includes a description of all on-site plant communities <br />and wildlife habitats, as well as all known sensitive plant communities. Monk will make <br />recommendations for any required focused surveys for special-status species, if necessary. The <br />report will also discuss the likelihood of the presence or absence of regulated “waters of the <br />U.S.”. The report will discuss any potential regulatory/resource agency permitting requirements <br />for impacts to biological resources under current baseline conditions. Raney will internally <br />review the report for accuracy and adequacy in meeting the requirements of CEQA, and <br />incorporate the results of the analysis into the biological resources section of the IS. <br /> <br />Cultural Resources <br />The cultural resources section will describe the potential effects to historical and archaeological <br />resources from the buildout of the proposed project. Raney will request a search of the California <br />Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) and the Native American Heritage <br />Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File and include the results in the cultural resources section <br />of the IS. Raney anticipates that a cultural resources report will not be required; however, if the <br />CHRIS or Sacred Lands File search determines that more information is required, Raney would <br />propose to contract with an appropriate sub-consultant and amend the contract accordingly. <br /> <br />Given the passage of AB 52, and the associated amendments to PRC 21080.3.1, lead agencies <br />are required to consult with Native American tribes early in the CEQA process if one or more <br />tribes have previously requested such notice pursuant to AB 52. Raney understands the City of <br />Pleasanton has not received letters from tribes requesting notice pursuant to AB 52/PRC <br />21080.3.1. Therefore, Raney assumes that formal consultation pursuant to AB 52 will not be <br />required. <br /> <br />Geology and Soils <br />The geology and soils section will evaluate the potential for on-site geologic hazards related to <br />earthquakes, liquefaction, expansive soils, landslides, soil erosion, and other potential soil <br />constraints. Raney will rely on the geotechnical reports prepared for the 2008 IS/ND, as well as <br />the CBC Seismic Design Parameters Update (January 2023) prepared by ENGEO and the <br />associated technical peer review of the four geotechnical-related reports to be completed by BSK <br />Docusign Envelope ID: 2A85D316-C052-4009-999F-38708C3D7EBCDocusign Envelope ID: 9E909BA3-E203-400F-8158-F382D9C3612B