Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Wagaman presented the Purple map which uses Hopyard Road as a major dividing line. He <br /> advised this map does not separate the Hacienda Business Park but does split downtown. He <br /> explained this map aligns Ruby Hill with the area to the west. <br /> Mr. Wagaman presented the Red map which uses Stoneridge Drive as a major dividing line. He <br /> explained this map splits both Hacienda Business Park and also downtown with it being the first <br /> instance of the downtown being split on a north-south basis instead of an east-west basis. <br /> Mr. Wagaman presented the Orange map which uses the concept of drawing the whole Hacienda <br /> Business Park to the west into District 1. He explained this map also splits downtown. <br /> Mr. Wagaman presented the Yellow map noting it is a less-rigid version of the quadrant-based Green <br /> map, incorporating school enrollment zones into how to split Hacienda Business Park, and noted it also <br /> splits downtown. He explained he can also discuss the public-submitted maps but cannot discuss the <br /> intent of the submitters and can only speak to their legality and practicality. <br /> In response to Councilmember Testa, Mr. Wagaman suggested polling the City Council about the need <br /> to view publicly submitted plans beyond her request for discussion of the Combs, Katz, and Tor 2 <br /> maps. <br /> In response to Councilmember Arkin, Mr. Wagaman clarified the CVRA directly addresses race but the <br /> federal law is vague. He reported Pleasanton does not hit a demographic factor where it can have a <br /> majority-minority district, agreeing with her assertion the API population is dispersed throughout the <br /> City. He advised the CVRA's protected class provisions will be relevant to this discussion again when <br /> they get to sequencing and which districts are picked to vote first in 2022 as opposed to 2024. <br /> Councilmember Arkin expressed interest in a discussion of the Combs map. Councilmember Balch <br /> agreed with the recommendation of presenting the Combs, Katz, and Tor 2 maps. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch, Mr. Wagaman advised the deviation from the largest district to <br /> the smallest district needs to be less than 10% and, ideally, around 5%. He explained he can discuss <br /> elements of a certain plan as opposed to analyzing the entire map. He noted there may be legal <br /> concerns about some of the public maps taken in their entirety, but those maps may have an element <br /> the City Council likes. He confirmed the Waldron plan did not assign approximately 1,100 residents to a <br /> district. He advised if the intent was to add this area into District 4 it would fit within the permissible <br /> deviations. <br /> Councilmember Narum joined the meeting at 7:28 p.m. <br /> Mayor Brown advised she would like to see the Katz and Combs plans discussed. Councilmember <br /> Narum agreed to further discuss the Combs and Katz maps. <br /> Mr. Wagaman presented the Combs map. He noted it uses Stoneridge Drive as a divider like the Red <br /> map while Districts 3 and 4 are drawn similar to the Yellow map. He advised the shape of District 2 is <br /> unlike any in his maps. He noted the Combs map can be a great example of how the City Council may <br /> like half of one map but not the other half and potentially combine them. <br /> In response to Councilmember Balch, Mr. Wagaman confirmed the Combs plan would be legally <br /> compliant. <br /> Mr. Wagaman presented the Katz map and explained it is legally compliant. He advised the Hacienda <br /> Business Park is kept intact similar to the Purple map but noted the Katz map's District 3 goes much <br /> further east to include Birdland and Pleasant Valley. He noted District 2 also extends eastward and <br /> City Council Minutes Page 2 of 9 February 3, 2022 <br />