My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2022
>
021522
>
03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 9:34:11 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 9:27:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/15/2022
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Checklist <br />Tribal Cultural Resources <br />d. If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity <br />zones, would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslopes or <br />downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post fire slope instability, or drainage <br />changes? <br />According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFIRE), the majority of the <br />Pleasanton is not located in designated California Fire Hazard Severity Zones; however, the City <br />contains and is adjacent to areas classified as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity <br />zones at the wildland fringes located at the southern and western borders of the City.99 According <br />to the LHMP and the Pleasanton General Plan Public Safety Element, wildfire poses a high risk to <br />portions of Pleasanton at the urban-wildland fringe. The central, urbanized portions of the City are <br />not subject to wildfire risk.100.101 <br />Though there are areas within and surrounding Pleasanton that are at risk of wildfires, the CAP 2.0 is <br />a policy -level document that does not propose new residential, commercial, or institutional <br />development that could be at risk from wildfire, nor does it grant entitlements for development that <br />would have the potential to directly cause wildfire. In addition, the CAP 2.0 includes Action S9 that <br />aims to reduce the risk of wildfire in the community through awareness and educational campaigns, <br />improving early wildfire detection, and implementing controlled burns to reduce combustible <br />biomass. Thus, the CAP 2.0 would result in no impact related to wildfire. <br />Cumulative Impacts <br />The cumulative projects scenario is overall General Plan buildout for Pleasanton in 2025 plus Pleasanton <br />population projections through 2045. The CAP 2.0 does not include new habitable development that <br />could be at risk from wildfire, nor does it grant entitlements for development that would have the <br />potential to cause wildfire. Rather, the CAP 2.0 includes Action S9 to reduce the risk of wildfire in <br />the City. Therefore, the CAP 2.0 would result in no cumulative impact related to wildfire. <br />99 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFIRE). 2021. Fire Hazard Severity Zone Viewer. Available: <br /><https://egis.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/>. Accessed October 18, 2021. <br />100 Pleasanton, Livermore, and Dublin, Cities of. 2018. Tri -Valley Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Available: <br /><http://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdioad.aspx?BIobID=35090>. Accessed October 13, 2021. <br />101 Pleasanton, City of. 2008. General Plan Public Safety Element. Available: <br /><https://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BIobID=23899>. Accessed October 13, 2021. <br />Final Initial Study - Negative Declaration 89 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.