Laserfiche WebLink
ALAMEDA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 2016-09 <br /> (AMENDMENT OF RESOLUTION NO.2016-06) <br /> RETROACTIVE APPROVAL OF OUT-OF-AREA SERVICE AGREEMENTS FOR THE <br /> PROVISION OF SEWER AND WATER SERVICES TO PROPERTIES LOCATED IN <br /> UNINCORPORATED HAPPY VALLEY,REMEN TRACT, <br /> AND WEST OF FOOTHILL/SUNOL AREAS <br /> WHEREAS, Resolution No. 16-842 dated April 19, 2016 from the City of Pleasanton was filed with <br /> the Alameda Local Agency Formation Commission(LAFCo)on May 20,2016; <br /> WHEREAS, said resolution is for the purpose of requesting retroactive approval of out-of-area <br /> service agreements(OASAs)to extend water and sewer services outside city boundaries to properties located <br /> in the unincorporated communities of Happy Valley, Remen Tract and West of Foothill/Sunol areas as listed <br /> in Exhibit A; <br /> WHEREAS, LAFCo's Executive Officer has reviewed the application and prepared a report, <br /> including her recommendations thereon, noting that, in accordance with the provisions of the California <br /> Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), LAFCo staff finds the subject project exempt pursuant to §15061(b)(3) <br /> of the CEQA Guidelines because the application is for retroactive approval of existing water and sewer <br /> service and §15061(b)(3) states that a project is exempt from CEQA where it can be seen with certainty that <br /> there is no possibility that the activity in question will have a significant effect on the environment; <br /> WHEREAS,subject properties are located both within and without Pleasanton's sphere of influence; <br /> WHEREAS,for the properties located within the sphere of influence, Pleasanton has indicated that it <br /> is not seeking annexation at this time because: <br /> 1. As concerns properties in the Happy Valley area,the City is conducting a comprehensive study of <br /> water and sewer service at the Commission's insistence that will provide information and <br /> guidance on a comprehensive solution for solving this community's water and sewer needs that <br /> may include annexation; and <br /> 2. As concerns properties in the Remen Tract, the property owners are opposed to annexation and <br /> there are significant infrastructure needs beyond water and sewer service that impose barriers to <br /> annexation; and <br /> 3. As concerns properties in the West of Foothill/Sunol area, many properties are not contiguous to <br /> the existing city boundary, and the properties are scattered such that annexation would not <br /> promote a logical boundary for the City; <br /> WHEREAS,the necessity of continued provision of water and sewer services to subject properties in <br /> the West of Foothill/Sunol area outside of the City's sphere of influence constitutes an existing or impending <br /> threat to the health or safety of the public or the residents of the affected territory,to wit: <br /> 1. The City has provided documentation establishing that denial of the application will result in <br /> termination of water and sewer services to the affected properties because there is no other logical <br /> service provider,resulting in a health concern for residents of these properties; and <br /> 2. Staff have concluded there exist no alternative service providers to whom notice could be given; <br /> and <br /> 3. No water corporation has filed a map and a statement of its service capabilities with the <br /> Commission; <br /> Page 1 of 4 <br />