My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2021
>
090721
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2021 9:14:41 AM
Creation date
9/1/2021 9:14:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/7/2021
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
NOTES
ACTIVE GROUND FLOOR USE OVERLAY
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AGFUO-Public comments provided to the Planning Commission for the July 28, 2021, meeting <br /> Please Reject Main Street Retail Mandate <br /> On July 28,2021 the Pleasanton Planning Commission is set to consider a proposal by <br /> the Planning Staff to require that the front 60%of all Main Street buildings be genuine <br /> retail. The retail mandate just started recently with the newly adopted Downtown <br /> Specific Plan in 2018,which required that the front 25%of Main Street buildings be <br /> retail ("active first floor use"in planner talk,which includes restaurants.) <br /> So,why not up the retail mandate to 60%? Main Street cannot support the kind and <br /> quantity of retail the Planners are proposing to require. The building spaces are too <br /> small,the parking is far way,and there are not enough customers to support that much <br /> retail on Main Street. Instead of increased vitality,we will get empty buildings and <br /> struggling businesses—the opposite of vitality. <br /> When City Council discussed the possibility of upping the retail mandate to 60% in early <br /> June,several Council members pointed out that the 25% retail mandate has only been <br /> around for a year and half,during covid, during which many building owners have lost <br /> tenants,forgiven rent,and are having trouble renting spaces. <br /> The Planners proposed mandatory retail in 1993,2001,and 2009. In each case the <br /> Pleasanton Downtown Association opposed the mandate,and City Council rejected the <br /> mandate. This was a downtown, not a shopping center. <br /> Between 1994 and 2004 retail sales in Downtown doubled—without a retail mandate— <br /> because the City spent on widened sidewalks for Main Street,and opened sidewalk <br /> dining,which brought customers Downtown,especially later in the day,which led to <br /> more retail sales. <br /> The 2018 Downtown Specific Plan also prohibits banks on Main Street. For many years <br /> the Planners required that banks had to have a branch in downtown. Now many <br /> buildings are adapted to banking and occupied by banks. Banks bring customers <br /> Downtown every day,which helps our struggling retail stores. <br /> The Pleasanton Planners have not noticed that nationwide retail space is substantially <br /> overbuilt, and often vacant. Small retail specialty stores,of the kind that could fit into <br /> the undersized building spaces with inadequate parking in Downtown, have been <br /> savaged by the increase in ecommerce, like by Amazon. <br /> The Planning Commission will have made their recommendation by the time this <br /> column is printed, but City Council makes the final decision. I suggest that City Council <br /> please leave the retail mandate at only 25%,and see if that helps or hurts Downtown <br /> vitality. We do not need more empty buildings and struggling businesses on Main <br /> Street. <br /> Peter MacDonald 7-24-2021 <br /> Distributed to City Council for the September 7, 2021, meeting Page 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.