11 ATTACHMENTS 6-9 - Laserfiche WebLink

Why were these projects not included in the air quality or previously perfumed traffic analysis? Please update the analysis to include emissions from these projects. 6. Page 44, Freeway Sources: Were the Freeway Sources of emissions part of the cumulative air quality Heath Risk Analysis? Please provide a diagram that illustrates the 1000-foot modeling boundary for the Freeway Sources. 7. Appendix A,Table 4: Explain rational for reducing trip generation. 8. Appendix A,Table 6: Explain rational for reducing trip generation. 9. Appendix A, Table 8: Does not include Fuel Truck emissions. 10. Appendix A,Table 13: Does not include Fuel Truck emissions. Technical Memo on Updated Air Quality Analysis 1. Page 15, Para. 3.a.i: What is basis for annual gasoline throughput,other than "provided by the city"? 2. Table 4: Provide data from other Costco operations that corroborates daily truck deliveries. 3. Page 28-29: The changed emission models have significantly reduced emissions to the point where what was a "significant and unavoidable impact" in the Draft SEIR to "less than significant impact" in the Supplemental SEIR is too good to be true from Costco and the city's standpoint in terms of approving the project. Provide the technical and regulatory basis for making the modeling change. 4. Table 14: Same question. Greenhouse Gas Technical Analysis 1. Page 10: How can a "CEQA-qualified" Climate Action Plan (CAP) adopted prior to the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update comply with the CO2e reductions as mandated by the 2017 plan? 2. Page 18, para, 2.4: Describe how the construction of the JDEDZ would hamper the ability to meet the existing CAP GHG reduction goals? 3. Page 18, para, 2.4: Provide an update on Pleasanton's progress on meeting GHG reduction goals of the CAP. 4. Table 3: The Emissions Reductions Strategies are policies, not firm or approved plans,and speculative at best. Provide the basis for calculation of GHG reductions for each strategy, timeline for implementation, and approval process to implement each strategy. 5. Table 3 and Chapter 2 Conclusion: How will current and future residential, commercial,and industrial growth affect the conclusion that CAP policies will offset GHG impacts of the JDEDZ? 6. Page 22, Energy Use: SB 32 will require broad-based electrification of energy usage to achieve its carbon reduction goals. Cities in California such as Berkeley have already adopted polices for full electrification of all new construction. Simply complying with the Title 24 Energy Code will be inadequate. Please explain why the city has not required the JDEDZ to be designed as a non- natural gas,fully electric energy usage project. 7. Page 34: What is the legal basis for the city to ignore SB 32 mandates for reducing GHG by 40% of 1990 levels by 2030? 8. Page 35: What is the legal basis for the city to ignore BAAQMD existing emissions efficiency thresholds? 2