My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2019
>
101519
>
16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2019 4:41:22 PM
Creation date
10/9/2019 4:15:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/15/2019
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
16 ATTACHMENT 4 (PLANS)
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2019\101519
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Brown further clarified that the church and Mr. Hu were actually asking for the <br /> 18-inch retaining wall and a six-foot fence, therefore, seven and a half feet in total. <br /> Mr. Barton continued to explain what was being requested, stating there are crimes that occur, <br /> and this height would help someone who was trying to flee the property going that direction. <br /> The most common scenario is customers parking along the row of parking and entering and <br /> exiting while visiting the 7-Eleven. To clarify, the applicant is just proposing the 18-inch <br /> retaining wall and staff is conditioning wrought iron on top of that. <br /> Commissioner Balch said staff is addressing Condition No. 11 which is currently stated as <br /> four feet and clarifying because the work session indicated four feet and there was a grade <br /> elevation change. He did not think the fence was declining in height as it gets to the sidewalk, <br /> but it does stop 20 feet from the property line. <br /> Commissioner Brown referenced the site rendering which shows that as it gets towards the <br /> street, the retaining wall itself does decrease in height above grade, although the top is still <br /> level. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> Mr. Schafer spoke in regard to the grade changes of the retaining wall on the site and said the <br /> 18-inches will continue to the back or southwest corner and around the other side. Heading <br /> towards Hopyard Road, the wall is proposed to remain at 18-inches until the 20-foot section <br /> and then gradually fade in. <br /> Commissioner Balch confirmed the proposal is for an 18-inch retaining wall from the 20-foot <br /> point all the way to the back side of the property from Hopyard Road. <br /> Commissioner Brown said he thinks the top of the wall is supplanted by the landscaping, and <br /> Commissioner Balch confirmed. <br /> Commissioner Pace asked what is planned for the 20-foot distance between the sidewalk and <br /> start of the fence and asked if there is shrubbery. <br /> Mr. Schafer responded that there is landscaping all along that area per the landscape plan. <br /> Chair Allen questioned the barrier and whether it is something people can trample over. <br /> Commissioner Pace asked for a visual of the landscape plan, and Mr. Schafer presented the <br /> plan. <br /> In response to a query from Commissioner Brown, Mr. Schafer noted that the area would be <br /> landscaped with bushes at three to four feet in height, with a variety of heights. The closer to <br /> the street the smaller the hedges. <br /> Mr. Hirst stated they have made a number of changes to accommodate neighbors to the south. <br /> What they originally proposed was a bioswale area which is a ponding area and it would <br /> discourage people from walking across it, particularly in wet weather. When they submitted the <br /> plan to the City, the City's arborist said if they have a bioswale they would have to remove a <br /> Excerpt: Planning Commission Minutes, August 28, 2019 Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.