My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENT 12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
050217
>
18 ATTACHMENT 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2017 12:19:56 PM
Creation date
4/28/2017 12:17:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/2/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACMENT 12
Document Relationships
18
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 08
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To the Planning Commission of the City of <br /> Pleasanton, September 8, 2016 <br /> This letter is in response to the planned development of <br /> Ponderosa to build 35 to 37 houses on the Evangelical Free <br /> Church property. <br /> We, as residents of Lassen Street, Mount McKinley and Mount <br /> Rainer, are EXTREMELY concerned with the proposed plans of <br /> the development's court entrance across from Lassen Street. <br /> These 3 streets have 25 homes, which would intersect with the <br /> Ponderosa homes, making it an intersection of 60 to 62 homes. <br /> We ask you to revise these plans to construct the entrance <br /> opposite either Mesa Verde Court (only 10 houses), Grand <br /> Canyon Court (only 8 houses), or Petrified Forest Court (only 9 <br /> houses). These courts have considerably less houses, and would <br /> accommodate additional traffic easier. In fact, Grand Canyon <br /> Court is already across from the church driveway, so they have <br /> proven they can accommodate some extra traffic. No other <br /> intersection in Valley Trails has to endure traffic from 60 homes <br /> (our 3 streets and Ponderosa's proposed 3 streets). <br /> As a 25+ year resident I can contest that traffic has always been <br /> a huge problem. We have a 25 residence court, each owning 2- <br /> 3+ vehicles, that all use Lassen to go in and out. It would make <br /> absolutely no sense to add to our traffic daily by adding another <br /> 3 streets directly opposite Lassen. <br /> We also need to mention that we, as residents, feel that this is an <br /> absolute blind corner to cross on foot, let alone by car, this <br /> section has always been a safety concern as people drive way <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.