My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
030717
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2017 3:00:33 PM
Creation date
3/1/2017 9:51:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Blank stated that this is dedicated retail space. <br /> Commissioner Pentin agreed, but the City could deal with Live/Work and the possibility <br /> of expanding retail up to 10,000 square feet if feasible. <br /> Chair Narum and Commissioner Blank disagreed with this direction. <br /> Chair Narum stated that she thinks the Commission should require the 5,000 square <br /> feet of retail on Owens Drive and have retail on Parcel 2 and Parcel 3 at the corner of <br /> Gibraltar Drive and Hacienda Drive as allowed but not required. <br /> There was consensus to require a total retail of 5,000 square feet on Owens Drive <br /> and to allow, but not require, retail on Parcel 2 and Parcel 3 at the corner of <br /> Gibraltar Drive and Hacienda Drive. <br /> Live/Work for Parcel 2 and Parcel 3 <br /> Commissioner Pentin stated that the concept of a Live/Work environment that is a rental <br /> is great, but he has not seen one. He expressed concerned that Live/Work does not <br /> always work and what happens then is a Live/Live with closed windows and drapes. He <br /> noted that there would then be a problem with what the hardscape and softscape on the <br /> front of the building would look like. He indicated that he would not want to mandate the <br /> owners to put them in, but he would not want the buildings to look like large apartments. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that this is a design issue because of the height <br /> requirements. He noted that it should be the builder's option, as opposed to a <br /> requirement, to build Live/Work and suggested that language be included to indicate <br /> that it could be a Live/Live with the option to convert to Live/Work over time as feasible. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that he likes the idea of making it a builder's option because <br /> the guideline would be in place, and should the market change significantly between <br /> now and the future, the developer would have the opportunity to put in Live/Live or <br /> Live/Work units. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that if a developer chooses to build Live/Live in areas <br /> designed for Live/Work, some of the design guidelines would have to be changed to <br /> include softscape for Live/Live so the frontage do not look like a storefront window when <br /> it is really someone's apartment. <br /> Chair Narum agreed. <br /> Commissioner Pearce stated that her intent was not to restrict this area but to provide <br /> more flexibility to make it more active, which is why they are called Active Use spaces. <br /> She suggested making it a Live/Live with the opportunity to flip it over to a retail or <br /> Live/Work at a later date. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 26, 2011 Page 27 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.