My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
030717
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2017 3:00:33 PM
Creation date
3/1/2017 9:51:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
There was consensus: <br /> • that if BRE does the trails, the setbacks would be reduced as proposed by <br /> Mr. Wayland; <br /> • to provide incentives for land set aside for public parks; and <br /> • to include a sunset clause if there is not significant progress at the time the <br /> application is set. <br /> Residential density: need for an average density to be included in the TOD Standards <br /> and Guidelines <br /> Chair Narum stated that the density range is currently 30-55 units per acre. <br /> Commissioner Pearce indicated that there was a lot of discussion about density at the <br /> Task Force meetings and that she is comfortable with these numbers. <br /> Chair Narum stated that she supported restricting the density to an average of 35 units, <br /> particularly for Parcel 2, because it is across from the residents. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that Mr. Wayland had indicated that it will not be <br /> feasible to go much over 30 units per acre to begin with because of the costs. He <br /> indicated, however, that he thinks a minimum of 30 units should be kept in order to meet <br /> what the City needs for the court settlement. <br /> Commissioner Blank stated that he was not certain about the value of putting that <br /> restriction. <br /> Chair Narum noted that the way the document is written, all three parcels could be <br /> developed at 55 units per acre, which would be 1,500 units versus 800 units. <br /> Commissioner Pearce stated that even if an applicant came in with 55 units and meets <br /> the guidelines, the City still has the discretion to modify the application. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that he thinks the Commission would want to give the <br /> developer a heads-up and not have the developer go through all the expense. <br /> Chair Narum stated that Parcel 2 could have an overall average density not to exceed <br /> 35 units, so one part could be 25 units and another would be ten units. <br /> Commissioner Pearce stated that she feels what the Commission sometimes does is <br /> pick numbers out of the air and hope they are right. She indicated that she would rather <br /> keep it where it is at, have an applicant come to the City, and look at the actual project. <br /> Commissioner Blank agreed and stated that it seems like micromanaging. <br /> Commissioner Pentin suggested that the developer weigh in. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 26, 2011 Page 22 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.