My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
030717
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2017 3:00:33 PM
Creation date
3/1/2017 9:51:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Pearce noted that it appears staff has looked into Kaiser's mission <br /> statement and inquired whether the City thinks it is feasible to get an easement <br /> agreement from Kaiser by the end of the year. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that he hopes an agreement could be reached by then. He stated that <br /> considering what he sees as the extreme benefit, one can work around ten feet with this <br /> size of a parcel. He likewise indicated that the one behind Parcel 2 on the north end is <br /> probably more critical of the two, and he emphasized Chair Narum's comment regarding <br /> making the development walkable. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that all literature on walkable communities indicates that smaller block <br /> sizes are needed, and this is what the Task Force and staff are trying to do. He added <br /> that Mr. Fleissig, the TOD consultant, travels all over the country talking to TOD experts <br /> with similar stature in the field about what the most important components of TOD are, <br /> and one emphasized including retail and another getting block sizes smaller. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor noted that if the City is not able to work things out with Kaiser, <br /> it would not want to end up with half a trail that would never be put in. He inquired if any <br /> resulting pathway would be owned by and dedicated to the City. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that he was not certain what instrument would be used but that he <br /> thinks it would be an easement. He indicated that it sounds reasonable to have a <br /> sunset, but he thinks that a recommendation to the City Council should include <br /> language indicating that substantial progress has been made rather than specifying a <br /> sunset when the deal should be completed. He reiterated that staff is reasonably <br /> certain that this would be accomplished. <br /> Chair Narum inquired if he would be opposed to adding some wording in the document <br /> to that effect. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that if this is compelling to the Commission, it is not an unreasonable <br /> thing to do. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that he thinks this is necessary. He noted that if this is <br /> an easement, the property owners would have to accept liability as well. <br /> Commissioner Pearce referred back to the parks issue and indicated that her <br /> fundamental question is whether or not a park belongs in what is technically an urban <br /> setting. She indicated that she has had this conversation a lot and sat through all Task <br /> Force meetings, and she is not convinced that in such an urban setting, the City cannot <br /> utilize non-traditional open spaces. She expressed interest in the incentive idea, <br /> however, and inquired if staff has thought about ways to manage this. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that the main incentive he thought about would be some type of credit <br /> on the park dedication fee beyond just the acreage provided. He explained that the <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 26, 2011 Page 20 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.