My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
030717
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2017 3:00:33 PM
Creation date
3/1/2017 9:51:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Tassano continued that the second option, Option Al b, reduces the number of <br /> travel lanes from six lanes to four lanes. He stated that a four-lane roadway induces <br /> higher speeds because the driver is right next to the median and will only have to worry <br /> about the vehicle to the right. He added that the landscape buffer has been eliminated, <br /> there is diagonal parking and a bike lane behind it, followed by a moving travel lane. He <br /> indicated that vehicles backing out of a parking space would have to back across a bike <br /> lane and into a travel lane with vehicles that may be going 35 miles per hour. He <br /> indicated that with respect to the diagonal parking provided in both options, pulling onto <br /> a four-lane moving arterial would not be his recommendation. <br /> Chair Narum referred to the lesser design option and inquired if this would satisfy some <br /> of his concerns with the second option. <br /> Mr. Tassano replied that he understands the lesser option to be exactly what the <br /> second option is. <br /> Chair Narum stated that she thinks there would be some sort of median protecting cars <br /> backing in and out of the parking area. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that Mr. Tassano's analysis shows that he has a problem with the <br /> second option. He noted that Mr. Williams made reference to a variation of both options <br /> where the road is narrowed to one lane but only for half the distance so the curb line <br /> does not have to be changed on the east side and there would still be the protective <br /> median. <br /> Commissioner Blank commented that the problem is that the second option is not <br /> balanced, whereas the first option is balanced in terms of the direction of the car travel, <br /> He noted that, if he is reading this correctly, there would be three lanes going in one <br /> direction and only two going the opposite direction because of the left-hand turn lane. <br /> Mr. Tassano stated that this was how he read it initially, but it appears that the black <br /> lines which would be in the westbound direction of Option 2 are skewed when <br /> compared relation to the rest. He indicated that he believes the intention is to have just <br /> the two travel lanes, with everything north of the second line of the top black line as <br /> actually the parking area. <br /> Commissioner Blank noted he was looking at the left side, and Mr. Tassano was looking <br /> at the right side. <br /> Mr. Tassano stated that he thinks the right-turn lane becomes a parking lane. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor asked Mr. Tassano if he was comfortable with just one traffic <br /> lane in each direction with no buffer, and if this option was analyzed. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 26, 2011 Page 17 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.