My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
030717
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2017 3:00:33 PM
Creation date
3/1/2017 9:51:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Blank referred to the allowed uses on pages 15 and 16 of the Design <br /> Guidelines. He stated that there may be people who may potentially be in Live/Work, <br /> and he noted that there are uses listed for Retail Space which are not listed for <br /> Live/Work, such as "tailor." <br /> Ms. Stern explained that these are all permitted uses. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor referred to the "residential uses" listed as an allowed use for <br /> Live/Work. He inquired whether this meant that residential uses are allowed as long as <br /> the unit is designed to accommodate Live/Work that it could be full residential until <br /> someone would request a live/work situation. <br /> Mr. Dolan said yes. <br /> Commissioner Pentin inquired if it would be necessary to spell out in the guidelines that <br /> it could be a Live/Live and strictly residential until such use. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that some language could be added to that effect, although he was <br /> not sure whether he would use the term "Live/Live" which is becoming more popular. <br /> Mr. Dolan then presented his report. He stated that he would review the table of issues <br /> starting on page 5 of the staff report. He noted that these are areas that resonated with <br /> all the Task Force members and where there was considerable discussion over the <br /> entire length of the process. He added that in most cases, the members did not come <br /> to unanimous consensus on any of them. Mr. Dolan indicated that what is in the <br /> document represents generally what the majority of the members thought on the final <br /> day. He noted, however, that there were minority opinions and that on some issues, the <br /> Commission might very well forward a different recommendation to the City Council <br /> than the final conclusion of the Task Force. <br /> • Feasibility of the potential projects. Staff is required through the Settlement <br /> Agreement not to impose standards and guidelines that would deem a project <br /> infeasible. This is fairly broad, and the determination of what is infeasible is <br /> going to be a challenge. The language is more than that in a normal <br /> development where rules are set and the developer has a choice to comply or to <br /> leave. <br /> Commissioner Olson inquired if feasibility relates to economics. <br /> Mr. Dolan said yes. <br /> Commissioner Olson noted that this would require the City to find a common ground <br /> with the developer so the project makes sense economically for the developer. He <br /> commented that he thought this is great. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 26, 2011 Page 7 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.