My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
030717
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2017 3:00:33 PM
Creation date
3/1/2017 9:51:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
guidelines, all use the same parking ratios, and although they will be slightly different in <br /> character, they all have generally similar massing and handle parking in different ways. <br /> He noted that a vocabulary of building types is used to allow for a variety of buildings to <br /> be placed within any of the sites to achieve the required average densities. <br /> Mr. Williams indicated that there are a series of architectural features in the design <br /> guidelines, with a real emphasis on building entries and front doors that face the street <br /> where the activity occurs and where visitors come. He noted that the project is oriented <br /> to the outside and to the public, with private amenities within the site plan. <br /> Mr. Williams stated that the retail store fronts as well as the Live/Work and Active Use <br /> spaces have a height requirement that allows for the flexibility to be either retail or <br /> Live/Work in the future, with a minimum depth of 40 feet and a little deeper at the <br /> corners to get reasonable retail. He pointed out that there are residential developers, <br /> there are commercial retail developers, and then there are mixed-use developers. He <br /> added that it is important to have someone who understands both residential and retail <br /> to create a quality mixed use development and make a successful use of spaces. <br /> Mr. Williams noted that the gateway corners are important corners which are visible on <br /> the site and need to be treated in a special way. He added that there are different ways <br /> to articulate these corners as part of the architectural features, such as prominent <br /> buildings, open spaces, or little plazas. <br /> Mr. Williams stated that the regulations and guidelines were put to the test by setting up <br /> a series of different parameters with an average of 30 dwelling units per acre as <br /> required and a series of different retail and Live/Work options, such as a tuck-under <br /> garage theme, podiums with garden apartments that include surface parking and <br /> carports, a stand-alone retail portion to the project, and a higher density residential wrap <br /> with a parking structure that has three and four stories of residential around it. He <br /> indicated that each of the alternatives meet the objectives and goals of the design <br /> guidelines in terms of density, parking ratios, and open space requirements. <br /> Mr. Williams indicated that all four various scenarios have similar characteristics and <br /> similar massings, with the higher density schemes having a bit more open space. With <br /> respect to the parking and open space diagrams, he stated that 30 dwelling units per <br /> acre can mean different things in site planning: a lot of surface parking and garages in <br /> one scheme and a bit more open space and more hidden parking with the higher <br /> density podium scheme. He noted that as part of a higher density strategy, the use of a <br /> parking structure creates more open space. <br /> Mr. Williams noted that the key is the future of eventual buildings that are developed, <br /> with quality streetscapes, quality landscaping, quality building design, and open space <br /> for the residents and the community. He indicated that the goal for the regulations, <br /> standards, and guidelines is to create a quality development that the community can be <br /> proud of in the future. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 26, 2011 Page 4 of 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.