Laserfiche WebLink
some policy and other major issues presented in the staff report, share staffs position, <br /> and make some suggestions on the Commission response. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that the Commission may ask Mr. Williams during his presentation any <br /> technical questions the Commission may have regarding the document; however, he <br /> recommended that the process would be better served if policy questions were held off <br /> until after Ms. Stern and he have completed their own presentations. He added that <br /> staff is willing to assist with respect to any aspect of the presentation and project. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor requested some clarification regarding the project timeline and <br /> inquired when the final night was that the Planning Commission could discuss these <br /> issues. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that it would be either tonight or at a special meeting. He advised that <br /> a City Council workshop is scheduled on February 8, 2011, the Council will be making a <br /> final decision at its February 15, 2011 meeting, and the second reading of the <br /> Ordinance will be done by the deadline on March 1, 2011. <br /> Rick Williams stated that the consulting team went through an extensive and relatively <br /> quick process in developing guidelines culminating in today's meeting. He noted that <br /> guidelines, key issues, and Task Force comments will be reviewed, questions <br /> answered, and then recommendations made to the City Council. Mr. Williams stated <br /> that in setting the purpose of the overall planning effort, he will discuss how the vision <br /> statement creates a walkable, transit-oriented development community adjacent to the <br /> BART station and integrated with the Hacienda Business Park and the community of <br /> Pleasanton. He added that he will also discuss the major structural elements, which <br /> roads are really the primary roads on which to face the buildings, which overall <br /> connections are really the most critical ones to have. He indicated that this framework <br /> is set up within the initial steps of the guidelines. <br /> Mr. Williams stated that one of the issues is Retail and Live/Work or Active Use space <br /> requirements, which highlights a minimum square footage for retail space as well as <br /> minimum square footage on Parcel 1, located along Owens Drive, in a number of <br /> different configurations illustrated in the guidelines. He indicated that based on <br /> comments from the last meetings, Live/Work was redefined as either a Live/Work or <br /> Active Use spaces so other uses could also be part of that frontage. He added that on <br /> Parcels 2 and 3, it would be appropriate to have the flexibility of having approximately <br /> 50 percent of the initial frontage to be either retail or Live/Work so that in the long term, <br /> there could be some additional retail to provide amenities to the residential <br /> neighborhood and for Hacienda Business Park. <br /> Mr. Williams stated that in most of the conversations in the guidelines, a series of <br /> different options were developed which is no different for Owens Drive. He indicated <br /> that based on the width and traffic evaluations, there are some options and <br /> opportunities to create a unique design that highlights it as a special place and gives <br /> identity to the community. He noted that the multi-way boulevard provides for diagonal <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 26, 2011 Page 2 of 40 <br />