My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
030717
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2017 3:00:33 PM
Creation date
3/1/2017 9:51:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
179
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Issue: Resolution: <br /> Should the standards and See Memo from Rick Williams (Exhibit E). <br /> guidelines incorporate LEED ND Note that many LEED ND concepts are <br /> requirements? included in the TOD Standards/Guidelines <br /> and that projects will be subject to Green <br /> Buildinq/CalGreen. <br /> Potential for future condo The implications regarding the income- <br /> conversions. restricted units and the units affordable to <br /> moderate income households will be <br /> addressed in the Affordable Housing <br /> Agreement. <br /> How should the Hacienda PUD be This issue will be addressed by the City <br /> amended to account for TOD Council. <br /> development? <br /> Affordable housing: facilitate Staff notes that the TOD Standards and <br /> development by a non-profit? Guidelines would allow for an <br /> "inclusionary" project or a stand-alone <br /> development. <br /> As noted above, the Task Force has reached agreement on most of the topics covered <br /> in the standards and guidelines. A few areas remain where there are differences of <br /> opinion as to the approach to be taken in the document. These include: <br /> • Retail. The Retail Mixed Use Market Study Update (previously provided to the <br /> Planning Commission) concluded that a mixed use, transit-oriented development <br /> is well suited to accommodate a 45,000 to 65,000 square foot "Urban Village" at <br /> build-out, featuring a series of small retail spaces and anchored by a small <br /> specialty grocer/deli and/or pharmacy. The retail study identified the Owens <br /> Drive area at BART as the primary location. Subsequent discussion among Task <br /> Force members explored the option of starting with a smaller retail area and/or <br /> moving the location along Gibraltar west of Hacienda -- closer to the existing <br /> residential east of Hacienda, and toward the geographic center of employment. <br /> The current draft of the document requires a minimum of 5,000 square feet of <br /> retail space on Parcel 1 and a minimum of 10,000 square feet on the three sites <br /> combined, as well as live/work or other "active" space on the balance of the <br /> Owens Drive frontage and on 50 percent of the Gibraltar Drive frontage. The <br /> requirement for live/work or "active" space would preserve the option for <br /> additional retail space (above the 10,000 square foot minimum) in the future. <br /> The Planning Commission should indicate any further recommendations <br /> regarding the amount and location of retail space. <br /> Case No. PRZ-57, City of Pleasanton Planning Commission <br /> Page 7 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.