My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
120115
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2015 2:37:51 PM
Creation date
11/13/2015 11:51:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/1/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
NOTES
THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 17, 2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COX CASTLE <br />Li NICHOLSON <br />October 26, 2015 <br />VIA E -MAIL <br />Jonathan Lowell, Esq. <br />City Attorney <br />Pleasanton City Hall <br />200 Old Bernal Avenue <br />Pleasanton, CA 94566 <br />Rc: Lund Ranch II Application <br />Dear Jonathan: <br />Introduction <br />Cox, Castle & Nicholson LLP <br />50 California Street, Suite 3200 <br />San Francisco, California 94111 <br />P: 415.262.5100 F: 415.262.5199 <br />Christian H. Cehriur <br />415.262.5123 <br />ccebrian @coxcasd e. corn <br />File No. 26440 <br />On behalf of GHC Lund Ranch, LLC, and its managing member Grecnbriar Homes <br />Communities ( "Lund Ranch "), I write to raise several issues that may be relevant to the Ciry <br />Council's consideration of the Lund Ranch II project. We understand that members of the City <br />Council have been lobbied to drastically reduce the number of permitted units in the project as a <br />potential compromise between several neighborhoods' objections to thc families and visitors of new <br />homes travelling through those existing neighborhoods. The staff report for the City Council <br />hearing includes a potential option of developing a ten -unit alternative that connects to Sunset <br />Creek Lane and that does not connect to the project site's existing access to Lund Ranch Road. As <br />explained below, further reducing the number of homes to address the neighbors' opposition to any <br />increase in vehicle trips would be unlawful and expose the City to substantial liability. <br />Summary of Processing Timeline <br />The original application for Lund Ranch I1 was submitted on September 24, 2002 and <br />proposed 113 single family homes. The application was revised in 2004 to include three alternatives <br />— a 149 unit alternative developed in response to the City's request for increased density, a 107 unit <br />alternative, and an 82 unit alternative. In 2008, the application was again revised to propose a 77 <br />unit development. The application was again revised on September 15, 2011 after the adoption of <br />Measures PP and QQ. This current plan proposes only 50 units. The City deemed this current <br />application complete on November 30, 2011. On August 26, 2015, the Planning Commission <br />recommended that the City Council find that the project is in thc best interests of the public health, <br />safety, and general welfare, and is consistent with the City's General Plan. The City Council has <br />noticed a hearing on the project for November 3, 2015. <br />www.coxcastle.com Los Angeles1 Orange County1 San Francisco <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.